Tools & Wizards About Us
stonefieldresort.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

stonefieldresort.com

Luxury Villa Resort in St. Lucia | Stonefield Villa Resort

Page Load Speed

28.7 sec in total

First Response

102 ms

Resources Loaded

25 sec

Page Rendered

3.6 sec

stonefieldresort.com screenshot

About Website

Visit stonefieldresort.com now to see the best up-to-date Stonefield Resort content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stonefieldresort.com

Book your stay at Stonefield VIlla Resort, our luxury villa resort in St. Lucia featuring private garden showers, gourmet dining, spas, and breathtaking excursions!

Visit stonefieldresort.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stonefieldresort.com page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 28.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

stonefieldresort.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,620 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stonefieldresort.com

102 ms

www.stonefieldresort.com

116 ms

12 ms

3935 ms

rt-min.jsp

133 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Stonefieldresort.com, 29% (12 requests) were made to D3l592tomi1h4y.cloudfront.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Player.vimeo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Tripadvisor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 293.7 kB (34%)

Content Size

851.7 kB

After Optimization

558.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stonefieldresort.com main page is 851.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 399.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 274.8 kB

  • Original 334.3 kB
  • After minification 332.8 kB
  • After compression 59.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 274.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 399.7 kB
  • After minification 380.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stonefield Resort images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 46 B

  • Original 112.7 kB
  • After minification 112.7 kB
  • After compression 112.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 47 B

  • Original 5.1 kB
  • After minification 5.1 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stonefieldresort.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (34%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stonefield Resort. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stonefieldresort.com

stonefieldresort.com

102 ms

www.stonefieldresort.com

www.stonefieldresort.com

116 ms

12 ms

3935 ms

rt-min.jsp

rt-min.jsp

133 ms

widget.js

widget.js

499 ms

899937915-3212c3b64a5b18bcb39a6788037aaef4b64e583249d89acd08efdb55a793aa9b-d_640

899937915-3212c3b64a5b18bcb39a6788037aaef4b64e583249d89acd08efdb55a793aa9b-d_640

532 ms

tripadvisor_logo_115x18.gif

tripadvisor_logo_115x18.gif

488 ms

_logo-xs_stonefield-villa-resort-stlucia-2.png

_logo-xs_stonefield-villa-resort-stlucia-2.png

34 ms

_stonefield-villa-resort-stlucia-2.png

_stonefield-villa-resort-stlucia-2.png

129 ms

kindtraveler_logo_for_press_placment_kindtraveler_vertical_w-o_tagline.png

kindtraveler_logo_for_press_placment_kindtraveler_vertical_w-o_tagline.png

128 ms

new-stonefield_wellness_20.jpg

new-stonefield_wellness_20.jpg

574 ms

stonefield-villa-resort__amenities_02.jpg

stonefield-villa-resort__amenities_02.jpg

428 ms

stonefield-villa-resort_weddings_08.jpeg

stonefield-villa-resort_weddings_08.jpeg

424 ms

liberation-serif-regular.woff

liberation-serif-regular.woff

566 ms

liberation-serif-bold.woff

liberation-serif-bold.woff

566 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

476 ms

liberation-serif-italic.woff

liberation-serif-italic.woff

177 ms

liberation-serif-bolditalic.woff

liberation-serif-bolditalic.woff

177 ms

widget_app_1664366167811.js

widget_app_1664366167811.js

137 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

45 ms

wejs

wejs

20222 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

4 ms

basb.min.js

basb.min.js

7 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

8 ms

js-plugins.min.js

js-plugins.min.js

7 ms

content-blocks-vimeo.js

content-blocks-vimeo.js

12 ms

intersection-observer.js

intersection-observer.js

8 ms

player.js

player.js

576 ms

js-picturepolyfill.min.js

js-picturepolyfill.min.js

560 ms

stylesheet.min.css

stylesheet.min.css

26 ms

stylesheet.min.css

stylesheet.min.css

30 ms

stylesheet.min.css

stylesheet.min.css

24 ms

s_-_woman_getting_mud_treatment-min.jpg

s_-_woman_getting_mud_treatment-min.jpg

209 ms

s_-_woman_getting_back_massage-min.jpg

s_-_woman_getting_back_massage-min.jpg

210 ms

stonefield-villa-resort_weddings_01.jpg

stonefield-villa-resort_weddings_01.jpg

212 ms

tripadvisor_travellers-choice-best-of-the-best-award-2021_cropped.png

tripadvisor_travellers-choice-best-of-the-best-award-2021_cropped.png

215 ms

FontAwesome.woff

FontAwesome.woff

53 ms

piconsthin.woff

piconsthin.woff

44 ms

oembed.json

oembed.json

250 ms

423468032

423468032

16 ms

ba-js-cookie-banner.min.js

ba-js-cookie-banner.min.js

37 ms

Accessibility Review

stonefieldresort.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Best Practices

stonefieldresort.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

stonefieldresort.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonefieldresort.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stonefieldresort.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stonefieldresort.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stonefield Resort. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: