Access storyscaping.com. Storyscaping and Brand Development Connection

Report Summary

About Website

Welcome to storyscaping.com homepage info - get ready to check Storyscaping best content right away, or after learning these important things about storyscaping.com

Storyscaping is critical for connecting brand development to consumers in a meaningful way. Learn more from Gaston Legorburu's New York Times Best Seller today.

Visit storyscaping.com

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value880 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

storyscaping.com

16 ms

storyscaping

7 ms

storyscaping

29 ms

glueiq.94edc117a.min.css

73 ms

webfont.js

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Storyscaping.com, 28% (26 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 23% (21 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (376 ms) relates to the external source Px.ads.linkedin.com.

Content Size

812.1 kB

After Optimization

723.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Storyscaping.com main page is 812.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 408.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 49.7 kB

Original 62.5 kB
After minification 62.1 kB
After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 318 B

Original 408.3 kB
After minification 407.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Storyscaping images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 38.8 kB

Original 315.2 kB
After minification 315.2 kB
After compression 276.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.8 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 26.2 kB
After minification 26.2 kB
After compression 26.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Storyscaping.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Storyscaping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Storyscaping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Storyscaping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

storyscaping.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Storyscaping. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Storyscaping and Brand Development Connection | GlueIQ

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)