Tools & Wizards About Us
stringscan.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

stringscan.com

Stringscan Technologies Canada | Web Design Company Canada, Kuwait, India | Website development | SEO | Branding | Web Design Canada | Website Develop...

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

282 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

304 ms

stringscan.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stringscan.com homepage info - get ready to check Stringscan best content right away, or after learning these important things about stringscan.com

Porto - Responsive HTML5 Template

Visit stringscan.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stringscan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 282 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stringscan.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.177

68/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stringscan.com

282 ms

css

31 ms

bootstrap.min.css

131 ms

font-awesome.min.css

124 ms

animate.min.css

127 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Stringscan.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (706 ms) belongs to the original domain Stringscan.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 385.5 kB (12%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stringscan.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 35.4 kB

  • Original 43.7 kB
  • After minification 36.7 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.0 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 51.3 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stringscan images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 149.9 kB

  • Original 373.1 kB
  • After minification 373.1 kB
  • After compression 223.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 149.9 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 148.8 kB

  • Original 254.6 kB
  • After minification 238.9 kB
  • After compression 105.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stringscan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 148.8 kB or 58% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (58%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stringscan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stringscan.com

stringscan.com

282 ms

css

css

31 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

131 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

124 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

127 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

130 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

123 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

127 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

200 ms

theme.css

theme.css

247 ms

theme-elements.css

theme-elements.css

254 ms

theme-blog.css

theme-blog.css

193 ms

theme-shop.css

theme-shop.css

194 ms

settings.css

settings.css

196 ms

layers.css

layers.css

323 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

318 ms

default.css

default.css

270 ms

custom.css

custom.css

263 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

310 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

103 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

321 ms

jquery.appear.min.js

jquery.appear.min.js

358 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

358 ms

jquery-cookie.min.js

jquery-cookie.min.js

508 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

509 ms

common.min.js

common.min.js

507 ms

jquery.validation.min.js

jquery.validation.min.js

508 ms

jquery.easy-pie-chart.min.js

jquery.easy-pie-chart.min.js

508 ms

jquery.gmap.min.js

jquery.gmap.min.js

509 ms

jquery.lazyload.min.js

jquery.lazyload.min.js

509 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

510 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

510 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

511 ms

vide.min.js

vide.min.js

509 ms

theme.js

theme.js

510 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

574 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

656 ms

theme.init.js

theme.init.js

547 ms

logo.png

logo.png

193 ms

slide-bg-4.jpg

slide-bg-4.jpg

472 ms

slide-title-border.png

slide-title-border.png

256 ms

slide-bg-4b.jpg

slide-bg-4b.jpg

638 ms

slide-bg-4a.jpg

slide-bg-4a.jpg

638 ms

dark-and-light.jpg

dark-and-light.jpg

284 ms

style-switcher.png

style-switcher.png

462 ms

project-1.jpg

project-1.jpg

576 ms

project-2.jpg

project-2.jpg

639 ms

project-3.jpg

project-3.jpg

636 ms

project-4.jpg

project-4.jpg

529 ms

project-5.jpg

project-5.jpg

594 ms

client-1.jpg

client-1.jpg

638 ms

client-2.jpg

client-2.jpg

657 ms

logo-4.png

logo-4.png

699 ms

logo-2.png

logo-2.png

698 ms

logo-3.png

logo-3.png

705 ms

logo-5.png

logo-5.png

702 ms

logo-6.png

logo-6.png

706 ms

logo-1.png

logo-1.png

570 ms

logo-7.png

logo-7.png

610 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

613 ms

logo-footer.png

logo-footer.png

624 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

36 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

50 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

80 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

79 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

80 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

610 ms

UqyNK9UOIntux_czAvDQx_ZcHqZXBNQzdcD8.ttf

UqyNK9UOIntux_czAvDQx_ZcHqZXBNQzdcD8.ttf

80 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

134 ms

v2.zopim.com

v2.zopim.com

145 ms

parallax-2.jpg

parallax-2.jpg

314 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

324 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

asset_composer.js

asset_composer.js

24 ms

js

js

63 ms

Accessibility Review

stringscan.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stringscan.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stringscan.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stringscan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Stringscan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stringscan.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stringscan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: