Tools & Wizards About Us
stuarthomfray.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

stuarthomfray.co.uk

Affordable Rubbish Removal in London | Stuart Homfray

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

97 ms

Resources Loaded

562 ms

Page Rendered

381 ms

stuarthomfray.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stuarthomfray.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Stuart Homfray best content right away, or after learning these important things about stuarthomfray.co.uk

Enjoy professional rubbish removal services in London by booking us. We offer some of the lowest waste collection prices in London and unbeatable quality.

Visit stuarthomfray.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Stuarthomfray.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 97 ms and then it took 943 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stuarthomfray.co.uk performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.406

24/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stuarthomfray.co.uk

97 ms

stuarthomfray.co.uk

36 ms

style.min.css

16 ms

styles.css

36 ms

bootstrap.min.css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Stuarthomfray.co.uk, 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (327 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (78%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

736.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stuarthomfray.co.uk main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 34.9 kB

  • Original 47.2 kB
  • After minification 47.2 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 2.6 MB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 583.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Stuart Homfray needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.6 MB or 82% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 91.4 kB
  • After minification 91.2 kB
  • After compression 80.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 45 B

  • Original 60.6 kB
  • After minification 60.6 kB
  • After compression 60.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stuarthomfray.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (65%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stuart Homfray. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stuarthomfray.co.uk

stuarthomfray.co.uk

97 ms

stuarthomfray.co.uk

stuarthomfray.co.uk

36 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

16 ms

styles.css

styles.css

36 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

28 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

33 ms

slicknav.css

slicknav.css

35 ms

style.css

style.css

39 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

34 ms

jquery-migrate-3.4.1-wp.js

jquery-migrate-3.4.1-wp.js

51 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

34 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

81 ms

icons.css

icons.css

79 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

81 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

80 ms

index.js

index.js

88 ms

index.js

index.js

87 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

88 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

89 ms

personal-custom.js

personal-custom.js

89 ms

deprecation-notice.js

deprecation-notice.js

95 ms

swiper.js

swiper.js

94 ms

index.js

index.js

94 ms

embed

embed

327 ms

Background-transparent.png

Background-transparent.png

101 ms

Stuart-Homfray-Logo.png

Stuart-Homfray-Logo.png

93 ms

Rubbish-Cage-Van-branded.jpg

Rubbish-Cage-Van-branded.jpg

96 ms

Junk-in-skip-branded.jpg

Junk-in-skip-branded.jpg

94 ms

Furniture-Disposal-300x200.jpg

Furniture-Disposal-300x200.jpg

93 ms

Construction-Waste-300x200.jpg

Construction-Waste-300x200.jpg

92 ms

Junk-Disposal-300x200.jpg

Junk-Disposal-300x200.jpg

104 ms

normal.woff2

normal.woff2

129 ms

normal.woff2

normal.woff2

133 ms

default.png

default.png

94 ms

forkawesome-webfont.woff

forkawesome-webfont.woff

256 ms

normal.woff2

normal.woff2

212 ms

normal.woff2

normal.woff2

185 ms

js

js

29 ms

Accessibility Review

stuarthomfray.co.uk accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

stuarthomfray.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

stuarthomfray.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stuarthomfray.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stuarthomfray.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stuarthomfray.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stuart Homfray. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: