Tools & Wizards About Us
studioegallery.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 3

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

studioegallery.com

Home | Studio E Gallery | Contemporary Fine Art Gallery in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

168 ms

Resources Loaded

973 ms

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

studioegallery.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Studio E Gallery content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about studioegallery.com

Studio E Gallery is your number one source for contemporary fine art and sculpture in South Florida. Based in Palm Beach Gardens, we feature Bronze and Glass Sculptures, Abstract, Figurative, Pop Art,...

Visit studioegallery.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Studioegallery.com page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studioegallery.com performance score

3

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.8 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,220 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.787

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studioegallery.com

168 ms

0f4e10a5ae74b062797bc912e.js

151 ms

insert.js

82 ms

css

72 ms

api.js

92 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Studioegallery.com, 28% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to App.chaport.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (448 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.lightwidget.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (51%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Studioegallery.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 227.5 kB

  • Original 257.5 kB
  • After minification 256.6 kB
  • After compression 30.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 227.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 525.7 kB
  • After minification 519.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studio E Gallery images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 664.0 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 551.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 664.0 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-95%

Potential reduce by 272.7 kB

  • Original 288.4 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studioegallery.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 272.7 kB or 95% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (79%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studio E Gallery. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

studioegallery.com

studioegallery.com

168 ms

0f4e10a5ae74b062797bc912e.js

0f4e10a5ae74b062797bc912e.js

151 ms

insert.js

insert.js

82 ms

css

css

72 ms

api.js

api.js

92 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

23 ms

theme.css

theme.css

57 ms

theme.css

theme.css

83 ms

js

js

118 ms

js

js

244 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

99 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

90 ms

owl.js

owl.js

87 ms

panzoom.js

panzoom.js

97 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

98 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

97 ms

site.js

site.js

114 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

222 ms

f7gu4n9f6t9upnigu946.png

f7gu4n9f6t9upnigu946.png

75 ms

lightwidget.js

lightwidget.js

74 ms

insert-main

insert-main

346 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

57 ms

js

js

125 ms

embed.js

embed.js

184 ms

3133b08388845f2e83d9501124b59135.html

3133b08388845f2e83d9501124b59135.html

448 ms

fallback

fallback

117 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

116 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

117 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

165 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

182 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

182 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfr.woff

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfr.woff

182 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfr.woff

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfr.woff

182 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-s.woff

182 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfr.woff

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfr.woff

208 ms

S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCQ.woff

S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCQ.woff

202 ms

themes.ttf

themes.ttf

114 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

70 ms

insert-main-61de4ad643b6c4b051004cea2cfb1065.js

insert-main-61de4ad643b6c4b051004cea2cfb1065.js

25 ms

css

css

25 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

19 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

4 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

3 ms

Accessibility Review

studioegallery.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

studioegallery.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

studioegallery.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studioegallery.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studioegallery.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

studioegallery.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Studio E Gallery. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: