Tools & Wizards About Us
studiothick.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

studiothick.com

Home | Today

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

601 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

743 ms

studiothick.com screenshot

About Website

Visit studiothick.com now to see the best up-to-date Studiothick content for Australia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about studiothick.com

A brighter tomorrow starts today. It’s time to think bigger and work together for a better future. We exist to make services, policy, and products more impactful.

Visit studiothick.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Studiothick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 601 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studiothick.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,050 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studiothick.com

601 ms

today.design

63 ms

gtm.js

81 ms

state.js

7 ms

2381f0f.js

3250 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Studiothick.com, 80% (8 requests) were made to Today.design and 10% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Today.design.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 162.2 kB (25%)

Content Size

637.3 kB

After Optimization

475.1 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Studiothick.com main page is 637.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 446.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 160.6 kB

  • Original 191.2 kB
  • After minification 190.1 kB
  • After compression 30.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 446.1 kB
  • After minification 446.1 kB
  • After compression 444.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (88%)

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studiothick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

studiothick.com

studiothick.com

601 ms

today.design

today.design

63 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

81 ms

state.js

state.js

7 ms

2381f0f.js

2381f0f.js

3250 ms

9cc80c8.js

9cc80c8.js

696 ms

7ea9e8c.js

7ea9e8c.js

13 ms

c4b8128.js

c4b8128.js

1381 ms

6fcb7a5.js

6fcb7a5.js

1791 ms

ae1aada.js

ae1aada.js

3055 ms

Accessibility Review

studiothick.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

studiothick.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

studiothick.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiothick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiothick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

studiothick.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Studiothick. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: