Tools & Wizards About Us
sugarcosmetics.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

sugarcosmetics.com

Buy Beauty Products at SUGAR Cosmetics Online Store

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

112 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

744 ms

sugarcosmetics.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sugarcosmetics.com now to see the best up-to-date SUGAR Cosmetics content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sugarcosmetics.com

Shop beauty products online by SUGAR Cosmetics at best price. Choose premium quality makeup for face, eyes, lips & avail exciting offers. Order now & get free delivery.

Visit sugarcosmetics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sugarcosmetics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 112 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sugarcosmetics.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value25.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value43.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.48

18/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

in.sugarcosmetics.com

112 ms

js

82 ms

webengage-min-v-6.0.js

58 ms

gtm.js

164 ms

hotjar-3428900.js

112 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Sugarcosmetics.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Images.sugarcosmetics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Images.sugarcosmetics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 163.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sugarcosmetics.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 162.5 kB

  • Original 206.2 kB
  • After minification 206.2 kB
  • After compression 43.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SUGAR Cosmetics images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 1.6 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 131 B

  • Original 65.7 kB
  • After minification 65.7 kB
  • After compression 65.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugarcosmetics.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (77%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SUGAR Cosmetics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

in.sugarcosmetics.com

in.sugarcosmetics.com

112 ms

js

js

82 ms

webengage-min-v-6.0.js

webengage-min-v-6.0.js

58 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

164 ms

hotjar-3428900.js

hotjar-3428900.js

112 ms

widget.js

widget.js

205 ms

29377d3c7e4995f8.css

29377d3c7e4995f8.css

26 ms

ba0ee703bfb95b67.css

ba0ee703bfb95b67.css

29 ms

2a1cb66304e0b2ad.css

2a1cb66304e0b2ad.css

32 ms

8c48d5f2844b0377.css

8c48d5f2844b0377.css

32 ms

92197d94cc400698.css

92197d94cc400698.css

31 ms

f22a40ff21a70ad5.css

f22a40ff21a70ad5.css

33 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

188 ms

2410-5cc5ffabbeb6a10f.js

2410-5cc5ffabbeb6a10f.js

33 ms

5675-3667e1573b1c63fd.js

5675-3667e1573b1c63fd.js

34 ms

2679.9091fdde9ddac10b.js

2679.9091fdde9ddac10b.js

33 ms

3955-518ffd5ea9caf8a7.js

3955-518ffd5ea9caf8a7.js

39 ms

3886-ce87e223eb304135.js

3886-ce87e223eb304135.js

39 ms

7369.c8fcd992550b393c.js

7369.c8fcd992550b393c.js

39 ms

8571-ef8206ade1b793e9.js

8571-ef8206ade1b793e9.js

37 ms

2752-06e7fb1eeeb3c4dd.js

2752-06e7fb1eeeb3c4dd.js

35 ms

8850-ffac5d3b31edea68.js

8850-ffac5d3b31edea68.js

39 ms

8999-2239ae32bd691d5a.js

8999-2239ae32bd691d5a.js

41 ms

5832-00aff37e6c5406ef.js

5832-00aff37e6c5406ef.js

41 ms

1806-06b60adda8a08c85.js

1806-06b60adda8a08c85.js

42 ms

2532-5e80a78e6ebffc86.js

2532-5e80a78e6ebffc86.js

42 ms

8514.794b0abb0cde37ef.js

8514.794b0abb0cde37ef.js

42 ms

6791.c5364506cf7033cc.js

6791.c5364506cf7033cc.js

42 ms

6529.80112467a863d6f7.js

6529.80112467a863d6f7.js

43 ms

7106.de26a0102f1b9105.js

7106.de26a0102f1b9105.js

44 ms

2384.645183aea305d4da.js

2384.645183aea305d4da.js

47 ms

3574.3ff82ae809e90af7.js

3574.3ff82ae809e90af7.js

43 ms

3474.feffe0593426f400.js

3474.feffe0593426f400.js

44 ms

3012.876767f7a67dd4ad.js

3012.876767f7a67dd4ad.js

43 ms

7296.6dfcef1a23f2f3b5.js

7296.6dfcef1a23f2f3b5.js

45 ms

9057.084e1f219101323e.js

9057.084e1f219101323e.js

46 ms

9332.353b5d7d73b09e56.js

9332.353b5d7d73b09e56.js

46 ms

4581.567e33b9bcb560d6.js

4581.567e33b9bcb560d6.js

46 ms

4276-cb17b06025abdce7.js

4276-cb17b06025abdce7.js

63 ms

webpack-55fc2b384ed01173.js

webpack-55fc2b384ed01173.js

62 ms

framework-09f3afa64952aba4.js

framework-09f3afa64952aba4.js

63 ms

main-6c4874ab5076bb95.js

main-6c4874ab5076bb95.js

59 ms

_app-07ca25f33a860006.js

_app-07ca25f33a860006.js

52 ms

index-aec946a6c0085b9a.js

index-aec946a6c0085b9a.js

46 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

42 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

43 ms

e4e638f6-67fa-43eb-9623-0a2dea7a09cc.gif

e4e638f6-67fa-43eb-9623-0a2dea7a09cc.gif

1009 ms

Rectangle_background.svg

Rectangle_background.svg

170 ms

933f06ed-6e9c-46dc-99ec-843caa8124c9.jpg

933f06ed-6e9c-46dc-99ec-843caa8124c9.jpg

239 ms

7ede0d09-cb92-48c0-b562-d583db444bfd.jpg

7ede0d09-cb92-48c0-b562-d583db444bfd.jpg

174 ms

0e99f7bd-a18d-4798-acbe-58fa496caa20.jpg

0e99f7bd-a18d-4798-acbe-58fa496caa20.jpg

247 ms

0cd46a62-8d57-4546-baa1-fb11b6dff5b6.jpg

0cd46a62-8d57-4546-baa1-fb11b6dff5b6.jpg

210 ms

45c85efe-ca2d-418f-8294-e2fb52ff9302.jpg

45c85efe-ca2d-418f-8294-e2fb52ff9302.jpg

1582 ms

Footer_sugar_icon.svg

Footer_sugar_icon.svg

156 ms

playstore.png

playstore.png

386 ms

apple-store.png

apple-store.png

156 ms

storage-frame-1.18.htm

storage-frame-1.18.htm

102 ms

Poppins-Regular.4b4ebe20.ttf

Poppins-Regular.4b4ebe20.ttf

9 ms

Accessibility Review

sugarcosmetics.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

sugarcosmetics.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugarcosmetics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sugarcosmetics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sugarcosmetics.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SUGAR Cosmetics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: