Tools & Wizards About Us
suturegard.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

suturegard.com

Advanced Suture Retention Devices | Suturegard®

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

148 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

511 ms

suturegard.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to suturegard.com homepage info - get ready to check Suturegard best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about suturegard.com

Discover innovative wound closure solutions with Suturegard® adhesive suture retention devices. Designed for effective wound care, high tension closure, and dehiscence prevention. Improve skin perfusi...

Visit suturegard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Suturegard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

suturegard.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,170 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.062

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

suturegard.com

148 ms

suturegard.com

396 ms

gtm.js

172 ms

js

212 ms

fbevents.js

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Suturegard.com, 15% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (535 ms) belongs to the original domain Suturegard.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 410.4 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

653.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Suturegard.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 739.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 59.3 kB

  • Original 78.9 kB
  • After minification 69.6 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 9 B

  • Original 80.6 kB
  • After minification 80.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Suturegard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 348.6 kB

  • Original 739.5 kB
  • After minification 716.9 kB
  • After compression 390.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 348.6 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 164.6 kB
  • After minification 164.6 kB
  • After compression 162.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Suturegard.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (71%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Suturegard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

suturegard.com

suturegard.com

148 ms

suturegard.com

suturegard.com

396 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

172 ms

js

js

212 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

99 ms

css

css

238 ms

css

css

84 ms

css

css

166 ms

css

css

324 ms

js

js

410 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

336 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

339 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

335 ms

js

js

333 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

164 ms

SUTUREGARD-logo-with-tagline-color.png

SUTUREGARD-logo-with-tagline-color.png

317 ms

platform.js

platform.js

245 ms

logo%20footer%20suturegard.png

logo%20footer%20suturegard.png

263 ms

script.js

script.js

535 ms

custom.js

custom.js

365 ms

delayed_load.min.js

delayed_load.min.js

228 ms

Body_bg_2.png

Body_bg_2.png

115 ms

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GCC5Xs1Ug.ttf

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GCC5Xs1Ug.ttf

103 ms

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GMS5Xs1Ug.ttf

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GMS5Xs1Ug.ttf

104 ms

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVi5Xs1Ug.ttf

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVi5Xs1Ug.ttf

141 ms

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4Gfy5Xs1Ug.ttf

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4Gfy5Xs1Ug.ttf

341 ms

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G1ilXs1Ug.ttf

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G1ilXs1Ug.ttf

223 ms

Home02PaneA-bg.jpg

Home02PaneA-bg.jpg

83 ms

284 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

236 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

227 ms

js

js

88 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

111 ms

Accessibility Review

suturegard.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

suturegard.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

suturegard.com SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Suturegard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Suturegard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

suturegard.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Suturegard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: