5.3 sec in total
262 ms
4.5 sec
552 ms
Click here to check amazing Swept Cleaning content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sweptcleaning.com
Maid Service in Austin that Goes Above and Beyond To Make Sure Your Home or Condo is the Epitome of Clean, and That's a Guarantee!
Visit sweptcleaning.comWe analyzed Sweptcleaning.com page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
sweptcleaning.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value800 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.114
86/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
262 ms
723 ms
717 ms
104 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Sweptcleaning.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Convertlabs.io and 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sweptcleaning.com.
Page size can be reduced by 193.9 kB (12%)
1.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Sweptcleaning.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Swept Cleaning images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 61.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.1 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sweptcleaning.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (67%)
82
27
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Swept Cleaning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sweptcleaning.com
262 ms
sweptcleaning.com
723 ms
6187.js
717 ms
js
104 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
163 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
280 ms
style.min.css
537 ms
style.css
400 ms
style.css
403 ms
style.css
403 ms
style.css
403 ms
style.css
409 ms
classic-themes.min.css
541 ms
shortcodes.css
541 ms
styles.css
542 ms
style.css
921 ms
font-awesome.min.css
542 ms
bootstrap-front.css
663 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.css
664 ms
frontend.css
664 ms
style.css
927 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
672 ms
jquery.min.js
104 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.js
794 ms
modernizr-2.8.0.dev.js
951 ms
jquery.validationEngine-en.js
794 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
977 ms
front-subscribers.js
975 ms
easy-testimonials-reveal.js
976 ms
js
104 ms
api.js
120 ms
embed.js
190 ms
index.js
1054 ms
index.js
1082 ms
bootstrap.js
1187 ms
all.min.js
1605 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
1083 ms
init.min.js
1187 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
1190 ms
.js
100 ms
chat.bundle.js
50 ms
js
61 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
collect
37 ms
sweptcleaning.com.json
46 ms
js
71 ms
fbevents.js
100 ms
trustlogo.js
500 ms
logo.png
172 ms
nav-trigger-dark.png
312 ms
MaidAffordable-LOGO-Social-Square.png
807 ms
Nextdoor2.png
903 ms
img2.jpg
172 ms
img4.jpg
310 ms
icon-1.png
310 ms
icon-2.png
309 ms
icon-3.png
427 ms
icon-4.png
428 ms
icon-5.png
429 ms
icon-6.png
430 ms
new-guarantee.png
556 ms
testi1.png
812 ms
testi2.png
681 ms
logo.png
558 ms
icon-phone-small.png
682 ms
icon-mail-small.png
682 ms
sdk.js
7 ms
new-testi-bckgrn.png
1986 ms
iframeResizer.min.js
26 ms
endpoint.php
1290 ms
sdk.js
53 ms
six-boxes-bckgrnd.png
1286 ms
fourth_section.png
1166 ms
social-sprite.png
882 ms
ProximaNova-Regular.otf
1164 ms
ProximaNova-Light.otf
1106 ms
ProximaNova-Bold.otf
1143 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1292 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1464 ms
190 ms
seal_bg.gif
202 ms
sectigo_trust_seal_md_106x42.png
1049 ms
quotes-up.png
1050 ms
quotes-down.png
1185 ms
warranty_level.gif
170 ms
gj.css
12 ms
bootstrap-grid.min.css
20 ms
iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.js
20 ms
vue@2.6.14
29 ms
axios.min.js
41 ms
sweptcleaning.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sweptcleaning.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
sweptcleaning.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sweptcleaning.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sweptcleaning.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sweptcleaning.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Swept Cleaning. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: