3.5 sec in total
637 ms
2.1 sec
725 ms
Welcome to swiftracks.com homepage info - get ready to check Swift Racks best content right away, or after learning these important things about swiftracks.com
We build digital products your customers want. Do you believe in your Innovative idea? Convince Us.
Visit swiftracks.comWe analyzed Swiftracks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 637 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
swiftracks.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value3.9 s
83/100
10%
Value360 ms
72/100
30%
Value0.233
53/100
15%
Value7.4 s
49/100
10%
637 ms
29 ms
56 ms
498 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Swiftracks.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (637 ms) belongs to the original domain Swiftracks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 117.1 kB (13%)
903.9 kB
786.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Swiftracks.com main page is 903.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 617.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.8 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Swift Racks needs image optimization as it can save up to 71.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 166 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Swiftracks.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (40%)
35
21
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Swift Racks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
swiftracks.com
637 ms
all.min.css
29 ms
bootstrap.min.css
56 ms
hbm8yzq.css
498 ms
formidableforms.css
51 ms
style.min.css
48 ms
style.css
47 ms
js
94 ms
bootstrap.min.js
49 ms
jquery.js
52 ms
custom.js
51 ms
responsive.css
51 ms
p.css
29 ms
SR-primary-color.svg
93 ms
hamburger-menu.svg
94 ms
menu-bg-noise.png
104 ms
white-menu-logo.svg
95 ms
menu-btn.svg
97 ms
banner-img.png
98 ms
ss-process-icon-1.png
100 ms
bg-noise.png
102 ms
arrow-button-hover.svg
97 ms
ss-process-icon-1.png
100 ms
ss-process-icon-2.png
99 ms
ss-process-icon-3.png
101 ms
ss-process-icon-4.png
100 ms
ss-process-icon-5.png
100 ms
case-studies-before.png
102 ms
case-studies-after.png
102 ms
gradient-circle.png
101 ms
airway-health-doctor.png
103 ms
js
89 ms
analytics.js
84 ms
js
84 ms
Avenir-Roman.woff
67 ms
Avenir-Black.woff
22 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
165 ms
collect
40 ms
print.css
2 ms
swiftracks.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
swiftracks.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
swiftracks.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Swiftracks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Swiftracks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
swiftracks.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Swift Racks. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: