6.6 sec in total
353 ms
6.1 sec
241 ms
Visit systematik.de now to see the best up-to-date Systematik content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about systematik.de
Sicherer Datenaustausch bietet Schutz Ihrer IT sowohl im Homeoffice, als auch zwischen den Niederlassungen oder Geschäftspartnern.
Visit systematik.deWe analyzed Systematik.de page load time and found that the first response time was 353 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
systematik.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.023
100/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
353 ms
772 ms
218 ms
332 ms
453 ms
Our browser made a total of 135 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (127 requests) were addressed to the original Systematik.de, 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Systematik.de.
Page size can be reduced by 190.4 kB (27%)
705.6 kB
515.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Systematik.de main page is 705.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 205.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 168.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 168.3 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Systematik needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Systematik.de has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (34%)
122
81
The browser has sent 122 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Systematik. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
systematik.de
353 ms
www.systematik.de
772 ms
styles.css
218 ms
style.min.css
332 ms
all.min.css
453 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
332 ms
ctc-style.css
333 ms
dashicons.min.css
450 ms
style.css
341 ms
font-awesome.min.css
448 ms
css
39 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
446 ms
frontend.min.css
574 ms
swiper.min.css
350 ms
frontend.min.css
702 ms
video-js.min.css
458 ms
kg-video-js-skin.css
455 ms
videopack-styles.css
459 ms
css
19 ms
fontawesome.min.css
476 ms
solid.min.css
569 ms
jquery.min.js
586 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
574 ms
loader.js
120 ms
animations.min.css
580 ms
floatMenu.min.js
582 ms
velocity.min.js
678 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
681 ms
theme-scripts.js
689 ms
complianz.min.js
693 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
694 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
828 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
828 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
828 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
829 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
829 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
830 ms
hooks.min.js
907 ms
i18n.min.js
907 ms
frontend.min.js
918 ms
waypoints.min.js
918 ms
core.min.js
815 ms
frontend.min.js
721 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
799 ms
container_R0PI1k9N.js
286 ms
Logo-negativ.webp
282 ms
systematik-managedfiletransfer.webp
283 ms
systematik-MFG-logo.webp
284 ms
Fotolia_27335399_M.webp
296 ms
ifms_logo.webp
385 ms
ga-hs-logo-264x65-1.webp
385 ms
1.webp
393 ms
2.webp
393 ms
3.webp
395 ms
4.webp
407 ms
5.webp
497 ms
6.webp
498 ms
7.webp
505 ms
8.webp
506 ms
9.webp
507 ms
10-1.webp
520 ms
11-1.webp
610 ms
12-1.webp
611 ms
13-1.webp
619 ms
14-1.webp
620 ms
15-1.webp
620 ms
16-1.webp
553 ms
17-1.webp
643 ms
18-1.webp
644 ms
19-1.webp
652 ms
20-1.webp
652 ms
21-1.webp
652 ms
matomo.js
674 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
55 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
73 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf
82 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
83 ms
wARDj0u
1 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
797 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
1236 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
798 ms
eicons.woff
896 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
989 ms
22-1.webp
675 ms
23-1.webp
720 ms
24-1.webp
805 ms
25-1.webp
798 ms
26-1.webp
813 ms
27-1.webp
908 ms
28-1.webp
897 ms
29-1.webp
808 ms
30-1.webp
823 ms
31-1.webp
900 ms
32-1.webp
899 ms
33-1.webp
902 ms
34-1.webp
894 ms
35-1.webp
822 ms
36-1.webp
910 ms
37-1.webp
902 ms
38-1.webp
906 ms
39-1.webp
906 ms
40-1.webp
912 ms
41-1.webp
900 ms
42-1.webp
907 ms
43-1.webp
900 ms
44-1.webp
903 ms
45-1.webp
906 ms
46-1.webp
913 ms
47-1.webp
900 ms
48-1.webp
907 ms
49-1.webp
900 ms
50-1.webp
902 ms
51-1.webp
904 ms
52-1.webp
891 ms
53-1.webp
869 ms
54-1.webp
773 ms
55-1.webp
754 ms
56-1.webp
756 ms
57-1.webp
675 ms
58-1.webp
692 ms
59-1.webp
763 ms
60-1.webp
763 ms
61-1.webp
670 ms
62-1.jpg
670 ms
63-1.jpg
675 ms
64-1.jpg
683 ms
65-1.jpg
755 ms
66-1.jpg
677 ms
67-1.jpg
681 ms
68-1.jpg
679 ms
69-1.jpg
680 ms
70-1.jpg
678 ms
71-1.jpg
667 ms
72-1.jpg
672 ms
matomo.php
2045 ms
systematik.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
systematik.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
systematik.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
DE
![]()
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Systematik.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Systematik.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
systematik.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Systematik. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: