5.4 sec in total
182 ms
3.8 sec
1.5 sec
Click here to check amazing System Pak content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about systempak.net
Tamper Evident Containers Our injection moulded containers provide you with a cost-effective packaging solution for multiple food products. 100% recyclable, ISO and BRC certified, find out more about ...
Visit systempak.netWe analyzed Systempak.net page load time and found that the first response time was 182 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
systempak.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value23.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.2 s
1/100
10%
Value1,800 ms
10/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value20.7 s
2/100
10%
182 ms
484 ms
150 ms
228 ms
235 ms
Our browser made a total of 153 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (115 requests) were addressed to the original Systempak.net, 10% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (8 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Systempak.net.
Page size can be reduced by 667.1 kB (19%)
3.6 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Systempak.net main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 431.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 431.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. System Pak images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 54.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Systempak.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 113 (85%)
133
20
The browser has sent 133 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of System Pak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 85 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
systempak.net
182 ms
systempak.net
484 ms
63nh0.css
150 ms
63ngg.css
228 ms
63ngg.css
235 ms
63ngg.css
311 ms
post-7.css
236 ms
63ngg.css
236 ms
post-9677.css
250 ms
post-61.css
302 ms
post-73.css
305 ms
63ngg.css
316 ms
63ngg.css
390 ms
css2
42 ms
63ngg.css
418 ms
post-81.css
378 ms
63nh0.css
532 ms
css
59 ms
jquery.min.js
403 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
403 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
452 ms
product-tiered-pricing-table.min.js
466 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
467 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
468 ms
js.cookie.min.js
498 ms
woocommerce.min.js
526 ms
s-202435.js
22 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
604 ms
main.js
604 ms
jarallax.js
606 ms
hooks.min.js
609 ms
wpm-public.p1.min.js
610 ms
country-select.min.js
611 ms
address-i18n.min.js
772 ms
TweenMax.min.js
624 ms
js
56 ms
63ngg.css
652 ms
63ngg.css
812 ms
post-9702.css
814 ms
post-9796.css
814 ms
post-9801.css
815 ms
api.js
36 ms
e-202435.js
2 ms
post-9877.css
814 ms
post-9883.css
739 ms
post-77406.css
660 ms
63nh0.css
658 ms
post-77443.css
658 ms
post-77449.css
659 ms
post-77454.css
645 ms
63ngg.css
594 ms
ajax-cookieconsent.js
591 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
581 ms
order-attribution.min.js
581 ms
gdpr-donotsell.js
520 ms
yith-wocc-frontend.min.js
495 ms
underscore.min.js
495 ms
wp-util.min.js
541 ms
swiper.js
1414 ms
main.js
491 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
478 ms
search-popup.js
477 ms
text-editor.js
477 ms
nav-mobile.js
1343 ms
frontend.js
1316 ms
login.js
1238 ms
index.js
1234 ms
select2.full.min.js
1234 ms
perfect-scrollbar.min.js
1369 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
1370 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1365 ms
single.min.js
1365 ms
header-cart.min.js
1205 ms
tooltipster.bundle.js
1206 ms
product-ajax-search.min.js
1098 ms
main.min.js
1098 ms
quantity.min.js
1096 ms
cart-canvas.min.js
1097 ms
off-canvas.min.js
1097 ms
jquery.ddslick.min.js
1106 ms
frontend.js
1129 ms
frontend.js
1130 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1131 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1224 ms
waypoints.min.js
1130 ms
core.min.js
1220 ms
frontend.min.js
1220 ms
product-categories.js
1221 ms
posts-grid.js
1221 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1225 ms
i18n.min.js
1252 ms
a11y.min.js
1259 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_Tkn9TR_Q.ttf
95 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_TknNSg.ttf
97 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_KUn9TR_Q.ttf
904 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_KUnNSg.ttf
905 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_d0n9TR_Q.ttf
910 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_d0nNSg.ttf
908 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_m079TR_Q.ttf
909 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_m07NSg.ttf
909 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_qU79TR_Q.ttf
909 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_qU7NSg.ttf
908 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_9079TR_Q.ttf
910 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_907NSg.ttf
911 ms
LDIbaomQNQcsA88c7O9yZ4KMCoOg4IA6-91aHEjcWuA_KU79TR_Q.ttf
910 ms
jquery.json.min.js
1217 ms
gravityforms.min.js
1221 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
1222 ms
utils.min.js
1239 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
1281 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
1277 ms
1fgtltmrg
897 ms
frontend-legacy.min.js
390 ms
elementor-frontend.js
399 ms
jquery.sticky.js
402 ms
sticky.js
423 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
496 ms
priotech-icon-1.0.12.woff
720 ms
occ-icons.woff
432 ms
SystemPAK-Logo-500px-2020-300x76.png
432 ms
Slider-bg1.png
783 ms
systempak-img.png
783 ms
slide-3-copy.png
779 ms
systempak.png
781 ms
container-1-1.png
584 ms
blue-berries-1.png
777 ms
CondiPAK-icon.png
587 ms
big-DairyPAK.png
776 ms
delivery-icon.svg
774 ms
recaptcha__en.js
38 ms
uk-icon.svg
748 ms
24-7-icon.svg
775 ms
recyclable-icon-2.svg
777 ms
MasterCard_Logo.svg.png
793 ms
Visa_Inc._logo.svg.png
791 ms
paypal-logo-1.png
704 ms
anchor
161 ms
styles__ltr.css
133 ms
recaptcha__en.js
137 ms
OIgm6ct-G6hNh5i9U8xy5lNjsT6YVTG9uZdpykbdxBU.js
74 ms
webworker.js
72 ms
logo_48.png
59 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
32 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
32 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
32 ms
recaptcha__en.js
161 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
186 ms
twk-main.js
186 ms
twk-vendor.js
200 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
214 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
206 ms
twk-runtime.js
213 ms
twk-app.js
195 ms
systempak.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
systempak.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
systempak.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Systempak.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Systempak.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
systempak.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of System Pak. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: