10.6 sec in total
32 ms
7 sec
3.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Szifon content for Hungary. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about szifon.com
Apple, iPhone, iPad, Mac hírek! Tesztek és tippek-trükkök ✓ Leírások, FAQ és közösségi oldal ✓ Csatlakozz hozzánk, olvass minket rendszeresen!
Visit szifon.comWe analyzed Szifon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
szifon.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value4.6 s
71/100
10%
Value530 ms
55/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.4 s
59/100
10%
32 ms
593 ms
58 ms
18 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Szifon.com, 11% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Szifon.com.
Page size can be reduced by 602.9 kB (20%)
3.1 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Szifon.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 587.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 587.4 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Szifon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 44 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (55%)
77
35
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Szifon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
szifon.com
32 ms
szifon.com
593 ms
css
58 ms
css2
18 ms
w.js
14 ms
szifon-logo-uj-honlap-feher.svg
89 ms
let-loose-countdown-long.png
365 ms
email-decode.min.js
14 ms
underscore.min.js
24 ms
wp-util.min.js
102 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
108 ms
jet-search.js
102 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
107 ms
order-attribution.min.js
102 ms
clipboard.min.js
108 ms
qrcode.min.js
108 ms
wc-quick-view.js
108 ms
frontend.min.js
117 ms
vue.min.js
115 ms
jet-menu-public-scripts.js
119 ms
frontend-script.js
410 ms
widget-scripts.js
119 ms
new-tab.js
174 ms
general.min.js
186 ms
OneSignalSDK.js
174 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
174 ms
url-polyfill.min.js
466 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
192 ms
enquire.min.js
240 ms
savvior.min.js
453 ms
object-fit.min.js
240 ms
bdt-uikit.min.js
506 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
241 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
242 ms
waypoints.min.js
242 ms
core.min.js
245 ms
frontend.min.js
254 ms
helper.min.js
265 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
275 ms
i18n.min.js
286 ms
frontend.min.js
294 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
299 ms
g.gif
92 ms
jet-elements.min.js
303 ms
widgets-scripts.js
311 ms
animate-circle.min.js
230 ms
elementor.js
242 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff
20 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff
33 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff
73 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff
86 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff
87 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-.woff
89 ms
frontend.min.js
247 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xGIzQ.woff
87 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc0CsI.woff
85 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc0CsI.woff
87 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEz4dKQ.woff
87 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic0CsI.woff
89 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc0CsI.woff
89 ms
flatpickr.min.js
249 ms
lazyload.min.js
542 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
259 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
648 ms
jupiterx.woff
705 ms
applecare-oldal-also-700x459.png
303 ms
videos-watchmyband-banner-v2-700x459.webp
13 ms
vision-pro-bannerek-felso.png
777 ms
Apple-Pencil-Pro-cover-700x352.jpg
12 ms
CleanShot-2024-05-06-at-16.28.32@2x-700x332.jpg
1779 ms
iMessage-tippek-trukkok-COVER-700x467.jpeg
1785 ms
Model-3-700x398.webp
2550 ms
iOS-watchOS-tvOS-visionOS-macOS-beta-20240430-square-700x700.png
2779 ms
380x800-isamurai-333x700.jpeg
2787 ms
applecare-oldal-app-323x700.png
3234 ms
keret-323x700.jpeg
3790 ms
vision-pro-bannerek-oldal.png
1900 ms
800x525-isamurai-v2-700x459.jpeg
1912 ms
keret-felso-banner.png
3787 ms
Apple-WWDC24-event-announcement-hero-700x394.webp
3797 ms
web-distribution-cover-700x394.png
2791 ms
faq-iOS17.4-square-700x700.png
3797 ms
Apple-elofizetesek-ingyen-COVER-700x411.webp
2801 ms
vision-pro-headset-1-700x394.webp
3804 ms
iOS17-cover-700x405.png
3809 ms
iPadOS-17-cover-700x394.png
4840 ms
watchOS-10-cover-700x405.png
5014 ms
WWDC23-Audio-Home-tvOS17-cover-700x394.png
4829 ms
WWDC23-macOS-Sonoma-cover-700x394.png
4811 ms
Szifon.com-kozosseg-TsM-700x359.jpg
4827 ms
800x525-isamurai-v2.jpeg
3822 ms
Vision-Pro-teszt-cover-700x394.webp
4918 ms
647e41d8a52c4b001936ae4e-700x525.webp
5206 ms
kokoniec2-square-700x700.png
5115 ms
P90479821_lowRes_bmw-ix1-xdrive30-09--700x467.webp
5227 ms
Apple-Vision-Pro-podcast-cover-700x394.png
5405 ms
Smartshop-es-okostthon-labor-podcast-cover-700x418.jpeg
5295 ms
Sonos-COVER-700x467.webp
5300 ms
IMG_5129-700x552.webp
5528 ms
AAC1BD37-0349-4551-9DEC-F1E1B62AA1F7-700x525.webp
5706 ms
app-logo-facebook.png
5233 ms
app-logo-twitter.png
5146 ms
app-logo-instagram.png
5100 ms
mastodon.png
4978 ms
app-logo-szifon.png
4813 ms
szifon.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
szifon.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
szifon.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
HU
HU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Szifon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Hungarian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Szifon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
szifon.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Szifon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: