23.1 sec in total
670 ms
13.6 sec
8.9 sec
Visit tarang.org now to see the best up-to-date Tarang content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tarang.org
Waves of a new future
Visit tarang.orgWe analyzed Tarang.org page load time and found that the first response time was 670 ms and then it took 22.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
tarang.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value2.9 s
94/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.8 s
56/100
10%
670 ms
316 ms
346 ms
765 ms
765 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Tarang.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googleadservices.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) relates to the external source Googleadservices.com.
Page size can be reduced by 333.9 kB (34%)
969.8 kB
635.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Tarang.org main page is 969.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 466.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.6 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tarang images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 208.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 208.8 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tarang.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 73.4 kB or 52% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (39%)
56
34
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tarang. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.tarang.org
670 ms
style.css
316 ms
style.css
346 ms
dashicons.min.css
765 ms
thickbox.css
765 ms
styles.css
763 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
777 ms
shashin.css
777 ms
gallery-css.php
821 ms
jquery.js
823 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1037 ms
gallery-min.js
1466 ms
widgets.js
1035 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
2142 ms
thickbox.js
1463 ms
jquery.form.min.js
2794 ms
scripts.js
2113 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
2906 ms
trunk8.js
2907 ms
shashin.js
2904 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2884 ms
conversion.js
1950 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
2399 ms
body.gif
1167 ms
wrapperbg.jpg
1161 ms
logo.png
1160 ms
top_img.png
1160 ms
pencil.png
1161 ms
nav_tab.png
1061 ms
banner_img.jpg
1061 ms
banner_h1.gif
1060 ms
container_top.gif
1059 ms
container_topbox.gif
1060 ms
con_box1_img.png
1060 ms
con_box2_img.png
1321 ms
con_box3_img.png
1312 ms
con_box4_img.png
1312 ms
calendar_img.gif
1306 ms
twiiter_img.gif
1302 ms
footerbg.gif
1304 ms
footer_left_img.gif
1303 ms
bordbg.png
1304 ms
footer_img1.png
1266 ms
footer_img2.png
1267 ms
footer_img3.png
1266 ms
footer_img4.png
1337 ms
footer_rht_box.png
1338 ms
footer_inputbg.gif
1337 ms
enter.gif
1337 ms
ga.js
4509 ms
5069 ms
sdk.js
705 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
703 ms
__utm.gif
1951 ms
2093 ms
850 ms
826 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
746 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
842 ms
tarang.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
tarang.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
tarang.org SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tarang.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tarang.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tarang.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tarang. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: