Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

technikempfehlung.de

Technik, Testberichte und Kaufempfehlungen › TechnikEmpfehlung.de

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

415 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

301 ms

technikempfehlung.de screenshot

About Website

Visit technikempfehlung.de now to see the best up-to-date Technik Empfehlung content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about technikempfehlung.de

All-In-One PC Empfehlung: CSL Unity F27 im Test. Günstige Bluetooth In-Ear Kopfhörer ausprobiert: AUKEY EP-T25 im Test.

Visit technikempfehlung.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Technikempfehlung.de page load time and found that the first response time was 415 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

technikempfehlung.de performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

technikempfehlung.de

415 ms

technikempfehlung.de

442 ms

www.technikempfehlung.de

674 ms

style.min.css

215 ms

asa2.min.css

319 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Technikempfehlung.de, 3% (1 request) were made to Cdn.usefathom.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (674 ms) belongs to the original domain Technikempfehlung.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 77.8 kB (79%)

Content Size

98.3 kB

After Optimization

20.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Technikempfehlung.de main page is 98.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 96.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 77.8 kB

  • Original 96.5 kB
  • After minification 95.4 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (93%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Technik Empfehlung. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

technikempfehlung.de accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

technikempfehlung.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

technikempfehlung.de SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Technikempfehlung.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Technikempfehlung.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Technik Empfehlung. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: