Tools & Wizards About Us
tectack.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

tectack.com

TecTack

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

198 ms

tectack.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tectack.com homepage info - get ready to check Tec Tack best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about tectack.com

Technologies, News, Reviews, Smartphones, Laptops, Chromebook, Tablet PCs

Visit tectack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tectack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tectack.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value780 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.422

23/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tectack.com

30 ms

www.tectack.com

116 ms

www.tectack.com

94 ms

adsbygoogle.js

172 ms

jquery.min.js

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Tectack.com, 44% (16 requests) were made to Blogger.googleusercontent.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Blogger.googleusercontent.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 179.5 kB (28%)

Content Size

643.7 kB

After Optimization

464.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Tectack.com main page is 643.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 296.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 113.3 kB

  • Original 139.8 kB
  • After minification 132.0 kB
  • After compression 26.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 296.9 kB
  • After minification 293.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tec Tack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 62.6 kB

  • Original 207.0 kB
  • After minification 207.0 kB
  • After compression 144.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.6 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (23%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tec Tack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tectack.com

tectack.com

30 ms

www.tectack.com

www.tectack.com

116 ms

www.tectack.com

www.tectack.com

94 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

172 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

26 ms

infinite-scroll.min.js

infinite-scroll.min.js

167 ms

realme-GT-6.webp

realme-GT-6.webp

413 ms

summary

summary

270 ms

adbanner.png

adbanner.png

374 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

49 ms

realme-GT-6.webp

realme-GT-6.webp

406 ms

etf%20ethereum.jpg

etf%20ethereum.jpg

406 ms

SnapdragonXElite_HeroImage.webp

SnapdragonXElite_HeroImage.webp

405 ms

S23_Ultra_7_800x.webp

S23_Ultra_7_800x.webp

430 ms

OIG3.h1.U9jaVDgThapZJFIaG.webp

OIG3.h1.U9jaVDgThapZJFIaG.webp

406 ms

S69646532ad954e23b74c90def2d524f.webp

S69646532ad954e23b74c90def2d524f.webp

744 ms

redmi_turbo_3_xiaomi_17127578269.webp

redmi_turbo_3_xiaomi_17127578269.webp

663 ms

AMD%20Ryzen%207%208840HS.webp

AMD%20Ryzen%207%208840HS.webp

637 ms

G5%20KF5-G3US353SH.webp

G5%20KF5-G3US353SH.webp

634 ms

Surface%20Studio%202%20YZY-00001.webp

Surface%20Studio%202%20YZY-00001.webp

638 ms

Alienware%20m16%20AWM16-7602BLK-PUS.webp

Alienware%20m16%20AWM16-7602BLK-PUS.webp

724 ms

HP+ENVY+x360+15m-ed0023dx.jpg

HP+ENVY+x360+15m-ed0023dx.jpg

946 ms

ASUS+Zenbook+Q407IQ-BR5N41.jpg

ASUS+Zenbook+Q407IQ-BR5N41.jpg

1001 ms

HP%20Chromebook%2015a-nb0023dx.jpg

HP%20Chromebook%2015a-nb0023dx.jpg

905 ms

ACER+PREDATOR+21+X+GX21-71-76ZF.jpg

ACER+PREDATOR+21+X+GX21-71-76ZF.jpg

929 ms

css

css

179 ms

atelier-dune-dark.min.css

atelier-dune-dark.min.css

173 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

174 ms

collect

collect

62 ms

js

js

152 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwMOPIDU.ttf

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwMOPIDU.ttf

80 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKB8a8zI.ttf

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKB8a8zI.ttf

124 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

54 ms

all.js

all.js

84 ms

all.js

all.js

18 ms

33 ms

Accessibility Review

tectack.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

tectack.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tectack.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tectack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tectack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tectack.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tec Tack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: