5 sec in total
168 ms
3.5 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Telespeak content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about telespeak.net
Visit telespeak.netWe analyzed Telespeak.net page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
telespeak.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value1,210 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.246
50/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
168 ms
426 ms
80 ms
157 ms
314 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Telespeak.net, 9% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (854 ms) belongs to the original domain Telespeak.net.
Page size can be reduced by 357.5 kB (32%)
1.1 MB
745.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Telespeak.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 514.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Telespeak needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 141.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 141.2 kB or 27% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 126.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Telespeak.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 126.5 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (94%)
82
5
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Telespeak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 48 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
telespeak.net
168 ms
www.telespeak.net
426 ms
ctrumbowyg.css
80 ms
color-trumbowyg.css
157 ms
style.min.css
314 ms
common-card-style.css
236 ms
profile-card-style.css
236 ms
testimonial-card-style.css
239 ms
post-card-style.css
237 ms
font-awesome.css
319 ms
styles.css
316 ms
stm.css
316 ms
styles.css
317 ms
font-awesome.min.css
393 ms
bootstrap.min.css
397 ms
fontawesome.css
472 ms
brands.css
404 ms
solid.css
404 ms
style.css
402 ms
main.css
629 ms
select2.min.css
480 ms
header_builder.css
476 ms
css
34 ms
skin-custom.css
714 ms
theme_options.css
486 ms
main.css
549 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
547 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
558 ms
swiper.min.css
563 ms
post-6.css
624 ms
all.min.css
656 ms
v4-shims.min.css
659 ms
post-979.css
661 ms
addtoany.min.css
701 ms
css
31 ms
fontawesome.min.css
706 ms
regular.min.css
704 ms
solid.min.css
740 ms
jquery.min.js
756 ms
page.js
41 ms
css
28 ms
button.css
774 ms
general.css
714 ms
grid.css
638 ms
date_boxed.css
562 ms
date_boxed_two.css
562 ms
side_image.css
571 ms
list.css
628 ms
full_image.css
554 ms
overlay_image.css
552 ms
slick.css
557 ms
rs6.css
561 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
565 ms
addtoany.min.js
547 ms
v4-shims.min.js
542 ms
strumbowyg.js
605 ms
vtrumbowyg.js
605 ms
color-trumbowyg.js
605 ms
index.js
535 ms
index.js
596 ms
rbtools.min.js
784 ms
rs6.min.js
804 ms
scripts.js
524 ms
bootstrap.min.js
520 ms
select2.min.js
511 ms
custom.js
697 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
664 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
633 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
627 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
626 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
626 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
727 ms
waypoints.min.js
723 ms
core.min.js
719 ms
frontend.min.js
688 ms
news.js
662 ms
slick.min.js
661 ms
underscore.min.js
710 ms
wp-util.min.js
706 ms
frontend.min.js
709 ms
eso.KJQApO2n.js
18 ms
dummy.png
541 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
199 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
317 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
339 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
340 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
341 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
342 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
341 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
340 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
342 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
425 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
424 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
849 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
854 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
851 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
850 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
854 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
851 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
851 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
854 ms
stm.ttf
852 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
172 ms
Color-logo-no-background_sig.png
606 ms
sm.25.html
443 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
80 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
81 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
82 ms
telespeak.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
telespeak.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
telespeak.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Telespeak.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Telespeak.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
telespeak.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Telespeak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: