Tools & Wizards About Us
testingjournals.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

testingjournals.com

4RABET INDIA ᐉ GET ₹40,000 NOW | Official website of the Sportsbook & Casino

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

63 ms

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

100 ms

testingjournals.com screenshot

About Website

Visit testingjournals.com now to see the best up-to-date Testingjournals content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about testingjournals.com

✔️ Looking for a reliable Indian bookmaker that accepts rupees? Then the 4raBet betting website is just what you’ve been looking for. Enjoy bets on your favorite sports and win big cash prizes ⚡

Visit testingjournals.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Testingjournals.com page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

testingjournals.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

testingjournals.com

63 ms

testingjournals.com

1055 ms

style-custom.css

281 ms

style.css

346 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Testingjournals.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Testingjournals.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 64.2 kB (29%)

Content Size

225.0 kB

After Optimization

160.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Testingjournals.com main page is 225.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 63.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 48.9 kB

  • Original 59.2 kB
  • After minification 49.6 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 40.1 kB
  • After minification 34.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Testingjournals needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 608 B

  • Original 61.8 kB
  • After minification 61.8 kB
  • After compression 61.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 63.9 kB
  • After minification 63.7 kB
  • After compression 54.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Testingjournals.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (62%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Testingjournals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

testingjournals.com

testingjournals.com

63 ms

testingjournals.com

testingjournals.com

1055 ms

style-custom.css

style-custom.css

281 ms

style.css

style.css

346 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

47 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1080 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

329 ms

aces-style.css

aces-style.css

1055 ms

aces-media.css

aces-media.css

785 ms

postratings-css.css

postratings-css.css

554 ms

css2

css2

61 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

1106 ms

animate.css

animate.css

1359 ms

style.css

style.css

2137 ms

media.css

media.css

2353 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

3760 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

2813 ms

app.js

app.js

2360 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

3170 ms

postratings-js.js

postratings-js.js

3342 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js

3808 ms

enable-sticky-sidebar.js

enable-sticky-sidebar.js

3363 ms

floating-header.js

floating-header.js

3372 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

3503 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

3620 ms

23b8c66013.js

23b8c66013.js

67 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

113 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

3266 ms

fon.png

fon.png

1656 ms

logo.png

logo.png

601 ms

en.png

en.png

613 ms

burg.png

burg.png

606 ms

burg1.png

burg1.png

613 ms

present.png

present.png

611 ms

insta.png

insta.png

1827 ms

telegram.png

telegram.png

877 ms

cropped-logo-223x40.png

cropped-logo-223x40.png

911 ms

pic.webp

pic.webp

877 ms

rating_1_over.gif

rating_1_over.gif

859 ms

rating_2_over.gif

rating_2_over.gif

1223 ms

rating_3_over.gif

rating_3_over.gif

1584 ms

rating_4_over.gif

rating_4_over.gif

969 ms

rating_5_over.gif

rating_5_over.gif

1148 ms

Accessibility Review

testingjournals.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

testingjournals.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

testingjournals.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Testingjournals.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Testingjournals.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

testingjournals.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Testingjournals. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: