Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

textiful.com

Text to Subscribe Service for Live Events | Textiful

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

738 ms

Page Rendered

673 ms

textiful.com screenshot

About Website

Visit textiful.com now to see the best up-to-date Textiful content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about textiful.com

A text to subscribe service to grow your email list by SMS. Integrates with Mailchimp, ConvertKit, HubSpot, Constant Contact, ActiveCampaign, Infusionsoft and more.

Visit textiful.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Textiful.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

textiful.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

textiful.com

46 ms

textiful.com

36 ms

page.min.css

18 ms

9eoi7ybpge.jsonp

40 ms

E-v1.js

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Textiful.com, 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (247 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 205.4 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Textiful.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 665.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 42.7 kB

  • Original 53.6 kB
  • After minification 38.3 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.3 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 162.4 kB

  • Original 665.2 kB
  • After minification 502.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Textiful needs image optimization as it can save up to 162.4 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 62 B

  • Original 428.1 kB
  • After minification 428.1 kB
  • After compression 428.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 236 B

  • Original 63.5 kB
  • After minification 63.5 kB
  • After compression 63.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Textiful.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (23%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Textiful. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

textiful.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

textiful.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

textiful.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textiful.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textiful.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Textiful. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: