1.7 sec in total
96 ms
1.4 sec
158 ms
Click here to check amazing Textingway content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about textingway.com
This domain may be for sale!
Visit textingway.comWe analyzed Textingway.com page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
textingway.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.267
46/100
15%
Value5.1 s
75/100
10%
96 ms
48 ms
31 ms
37 ms
16 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Textingway.com, 15% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 15% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (963 ms) relates to the external source C.yvoschaap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 144.8 kB (64%)
226.7 kB
81.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Textingway.com main page is 226.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 200.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Textingway needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 132.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 132.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (65%)
23
8
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Textingway. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
textingway.com
96 ms
bootstrap.min.css
48 ms
css
31 ms
css
37 ms
font-awesome.min.css
16 ms
animate.min.css
23 ms
creative.css
19 ms
style.css
20 ms
counter.html
151 ms
jquery.js
25 ms
bootstrap.min.js
68 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
72 ms
jquery.fittext.js
72 ms
wow.min.js
72 ms
creative.js
72 ms
textingway.png
119 ms
creative.css
54 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
14 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
15 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
15 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
14 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
13 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
14 ms
collect
13 ms
ene4zze.js
57 ms
c.yvoschaap.com
143 ms
proxy.php
963 ms
yvTJRpy604CFMoAQGSTZhvotcS5_L24R1axhneHzentffFpUgsMWeMJ6Mk6fw6NuSh90iY83ZAlTifoRdhXtgM.woff
31 ms
9VX7uIswVtIFJxgveyWF2z0eeIjVDNBpcaGO3Ngr2sbffwrUgsMWeMJ6Mk6fw6NuSh90iY83ZAlTifoRdhXtg3.woff
63 ms
ugclq8BXcv6rrCIznyFmuk_zYnNq1tB_b0lzqu6tTYqffFKUgsMWeMJ6Mk6fw6NuSh90iY83ZAlTifoRdhXt26.woff
97 ms
p.gif
118 ms
p.gif
130 ms
textingway.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
textingway.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
textingway.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Textingway.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Textingway.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
textingway.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Textingway. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: