Tools & Wizards About Us
texttake.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 77

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

texttake.com

Text Take | Guest Post Website - Technology | Write For Us

Page Load Speed

8.6 sec in total

First Response

680 ms

Resources Loaded

7.4 sec

Page Rendered

556 ms

texttake.com screenshot

About Website

Visit texttake.com now to see the best up-to-date Text Take content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about texttake.com

Text Take a free guest post website related to technology, fashion, beauty, clothes, Jewellery, lifestyle, food, business, health, and travel.

Visit texttake.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Texttake.com page load time and found that the first response time was 680 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

texttake.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.8 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,250 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.402

25/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

texttake.com

680 ms

texttake.com

852 ms

www.texttake.com

957 ms

www.texttake.com

2185 ms

font-awesome.min.css

428 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Texttake.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Texttake.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 71.5 kB (8%)

Content Size

915.6 kB

After Optimization

844.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Texttake.com main page is 915.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 745.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 59.2 kB

  • Original 69.9 kB
  • After minification 67.9 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 745.6 kB
  • After minification 737.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Text Take images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 61.3 kB
  • After minification 61.3 kB
  • After compression 60.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 38.7 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB
  • After compression 35.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texttake.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (48%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Text Take. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

texttake.com

texttake.com

680 ms

texttake.com

texttake.com

852 ms

www.texttake.com

www.texttake.com

957 ms

www.texttake.com

www.texttake.com

2185 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

428 ms

styles.css

styles.css

609 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

626 ms

dlmenu.css

dlmenu.css

641 ms

basic.css

basic.css

656 ms

grid.css

grid.css

669 ms

imageLightbox.min.css

imageLightbox.min.css

684 ms

style.css

style.css

819 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

837 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

858 ms

styles.css

styles.css

863 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

879 ms

screen.min.css

screen.min.css

894 ms

css

css

113 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

121 ms

js

js

156 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

956 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

959 ms

index.js

index.js

959 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1149 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

960 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

960 ms

imageLightbox.min.js

imageLightbox.min.js

1191 ms

jquery.dlmenu.js

jquery.dlmenu.js

1148 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

1147 ms

functions.js

functions.js

1253 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

239 ms

www.texttake.com

www.texttake.com

1579 ms

q1.png

q1.png

343 ms

menu-button.svg

menu-button.svg

632 ms

Mobile-Is-Hacked-Or-Not-1-800x675.png

Mobile-Is-Hacked-Or-Not-1-800x675.png

759 ms

who-viewed-your-Facebook-profile-800x675.jpg

who-viewed-your-Facebook-profile-800x675.jpg

775 ms

duplicate-content-checker-t-800x675.jpg

duplicate-content-checker-t-800x675.jpg

809 ms

Who-Viewed-My-Instagram-Profile-800x675.jpg

Who-Viewed-My-Instagram-Profile-800x675.jpg

1093 ms

Add-To-Me-Search-800x675.jpg

Add-To-Me-Search-800x675.jpg

1008 ms

16680335_5768291-470x390.jpg

16680335_5768291-470x390.jpg

974 ms

bubbles-gdb37305ea_1280-1-470x390.png

bubbles-gdb37305ea_1280-1-470x390.png

999 ms

blog-g6d2c66a29_1920-1-470x390.png

blog-g6d2c66a29_1920-1-470x390.png

1033 ms

Car-Accident-Lawyer-470x390.jpg

Car-Accident-Lawyer-470x390.jpg

1188 ms

resolution-for-instgram-videos-470x390.jpg

resolution-for-instgram-videos-470x390.jpg

1206 ms

How-to-host-virtual-exhibitions-2-470x390.png

How-to-host-virtual-exhibitions-2-470x390.png

1629 ms

16680335_5768291-160x160.jpg

16680335_5768291-160x160.jpg

1254 ms

bubbles-gdb37305ea_1280-1-160x160.png

bubbles-gdb37305ea_1280-1-160x160.png

1317 ms

blog-g6d2c66a29_1920-1-160x160.png

blog-g6d2c66a29_1920-1-160x160.png

1401 ms

Car-Accident-Lawyer-160x160.jpg

Car-Accident-Lawyer-160x160.jpg

1421 ms

resolution-for-instgram-videos-160x160.jpg

resolution-for-instgram-videos-160x160.jpg

1475 ms

How-to-host-virtual-exhibitions-2-160x160.png

How-to-host-virtual-exhibitions-2-160x160.png

1542 ms

Virtual-Candidate-Hiring-Strategy-160x160.jpg

Virtual-Candidate-Hiring-Strategy-160x160.jpg

1615 ms

about-google-review-widget-tools-160x160.jpg

about-google-review-widget-tools-160x160.jpg

1631 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1657 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

160 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

220 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

223 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

222 ms

linea-arrows-10.woff

linea-arrows-10.woff

1520 ms

collect

collect

135 ms

q1.png

q1.png

1461 ms

collect

collect

238 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

35 ms

Accessibility Review

texttake.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

texttake.com best practices score

77

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Registers an unload listener

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

texttake.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texttake.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texttake.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

texttake.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Text Take. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: