Tools & Wizards About Us
thechoiceins.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

thechoiceins.com

Choice Insurance Agency | Insuring Linton & Indiana

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

135 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

420 ms

thechoiceins.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing The Choice Ins content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thechoiceins.com

Compare multiple insurance quotes from your local independent insurance agent today. Choice Insurance Agency provides Auto / Car Insurance, Home Insurance, and Business / Commercial Insurance for all ...

Visit thechoiceins.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thechoiceins.com page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thechoiceins.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,330 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thechoiceins.com

135 ms

www.thechoiceins.com

273 ms

www.thechoiceins.com

724 ms

brightfire-lightbox.min.css

54 ms

carriers_styles.min.css

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Thechoiceins.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to Mlxwx3bywoz1.i.optimole.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (724 ms) belongs to the original domain Thechoiceins.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.6 kB (13%)

Content Size

843.5 kB

After Optimization

733.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Thechoiceins.com main page is 843.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 480.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 106.1 kB

  • Original 128.9 kB
  • After minification 128.0 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 273 B

  • Original 480.6 kB
  • After minification 480.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. The Choice Ins images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 170.5 kB
  • After minification 170.4 kB
  • After compression 167.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 63.5 kB
  • After minification 63.5 kB
  • After compression 62.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thechoiceins.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (81%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Choice Ins. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

thechoiceins.com

thechoiceins.com

135 ms

www.thechoiceins.com

www.thechoiceins.com

273 ms

www.thechoiceins.com

www.thechoiceins.com

724 ms

brightfire-lightbox.min.css

brightfire-lightbox.min.css

54 ms

carriers_styles.min.css

carriers_styles.min.css

86 ms

stellar.css

stellar.css

130 ms

main.c7587c4e.chunk.css

main.c7587c4e.chunk.css

97 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

142 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

100 ms

stellar-object.js

stellar-object.js

101 ms

js

js

59 ms

gaddon_settings.min.css

gaddon_settings.min.css

96 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

22 ms

core_frontend_scripts.min.js

core_frontend_scripts.min.js

104 ms

insurance_settings_scripts.min.js

insurance_settings_scripts.min.js

120 ms

8e92188b03.js

8e92188b03.js

62 ms

categories_archives_scripts.min.js

categories_archives_scripts.min.js

119 ms

brightfire-lightbox.min.js

brightfire-lightbox.min.js

181 ms

selectize.min.js

selectize.min.js

184 ms

carriers_scripts.min.js

carriers_scripts.min.js

183 ms

bf_slick.min.js

bf_slick.min.js

185 ms

frontend_scripts.min.js

frontend_scripts.min.js

184 ms

jquery.actual.min.js

jquery.actual.min.js

187 ms

brightfire_stellar.min.js

brightfire_stellar.min.js

187 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

186 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

186 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

265 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

265 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

265 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

264 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

265 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

264 ms

datepicker-legacy.min.js

datepicker-legacy.min.js

281 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

281 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

283 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

283 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

289 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

286 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

307 ms

akismet-frontend.js

akismet-frontend.js

312 ms

optimole_lib.min.js

optimole_lib.min.js

61 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

70 ms

choicelogo.png

choicelogo.png

40 ms

October-19th-Blog-Featured-Image-768x432.jpg

October-19th-Blog-Featured-Image-768x432.jpg

40 ms

October-16th-Blog-Featured-Image-768x432.jpg

October-16th-Blog-Featured-Image-768x432.jpg

369 ms

css

css

66 ms

brightfire_custom_icons.min.css

brightfire_custom_icons.min.css

129 ms

font

font

122 ms

font

font

151 ms

DewXAiKGIjI2Nf5AbGnRwMHAzJBRsZWJ02MTAyaIEYm7mYGDkgLD4GMIvNaRfTAaA0J5DN7rSLwQHCZmZw2ajC2BEYscGhI2Ijc4rLRjUQbxdHAwMji0NHckgESEkkEGzmYWLk0drB+L91A0vvRiYGFwAMdiP0AAA=

DewXAiKGIjI2Nf5AbGnRwMHAzJBRsZWJ02MTAyaIEYm7mYGDkgLD4GMIvNaRfTAaA0J5DN7rSLwQHCZmZw2ajC2BEYscGhI2Ijc4rLRjUQbxdHAwMji0NHckgESEkkEGzmYWLk0drB+L91A0vvRiYGFwAMdiP0AAA=

63 ms

Farm.jpg

Farm.jpg

460 ms

staff-gray.jpg

staff-gray.jpg

442 ms

Accessibility Review

thechoiceins.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

thechoiceins.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

thechoiceins.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thechoiceins.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thechoiceins.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thechoiceins.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of The Choice Ins. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: