1.8 sec in total
282 ms
1.4 sec
121 ms
Visit thefloatingstone.com now to see the best up-to-date The Floating Stone content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thefloatingstone.com
The Floating Stone EN
Visit thefloatingstone.comWe analyzed Thefloatingstone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 282 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
thefloatingstone.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value5.6 s
18/100
25%
Value24.5 s
0/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.5 s
92/100
10%
282 ms
79 ms
156 ms
242 ms
159 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Thefloatingstone.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to Srv.tomosfactory.fr and 8% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (693 ms) belongs to the original domain Thefloatingstone.com.
Page size can be reduced by 352.4 kB (28%)
1.3 MB
905.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Thefloatingstone.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 934.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 106.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, The Floating Stone needs image optimization as it can save up to 106.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 232.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 232.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thefloatingstone.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (35%)
37
24
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Floating Stone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
thefloatingstone.com
282 ms
default.css
79 ms
1988.css
156 ms
prototype.js
242 ms
scriptaculous.js
159 ms
ajax.js
158 ms
tomosphere.js
160 ms
style.css
158 ms
dailymotion.js
230 ms
newsletter.js
233 ms
builder.js
79 ms
effects.js
84 ms
dragdrop.js
84 ms
controls.js
82 ms
slider.js
80 ms
sound.js
79 ms
resizable.js
156 ms
ic_sq_fr.gif
488 ms
ic_sq_es.gif
489 ms
ic_sq_en.gif
490 ms
logo_pictomos15EN.png
79 ms
20_1988_tomos-cquoi.png
80 ms
20_347_tomos-heading.png
80 ms
box_pictomos15c_300.png
311 ms
boite_250.png
231 ms
box_pictomos15_1000.png
693 ms
img_HP_fullscreenEN.jpg
310 ms
LOGO_TFS180.png
462 ms
20_355_tomos-texte1.png
151 ms
20_355_tomos-texte2.png
230 ms
20_489_tomos-info3.png
300 ms
20_1518_tomos-fdddff.png
307 ms
20_1988_tomos-logotfs.png
377 ms
ga.js
7 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
thefloatingstone.com
311 ms
thefloatingstone.com
310 ms
thefloatingstone.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
thefloatingstone.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
thefloatingstone.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thefloatingstone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thefloatingstone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thefloatingstone.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of The Floating Stone. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: