2.9 sec in total
362 ms
1.8 sec
653 ms
Visit thexifer.net now to see the best up-to-date TheXifer content for China and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thexifer.net
Edit EXIF metadata, optimize images, and manage media files online. Upload from local storage, cloud services, Flickr, and Google Drive.
Visit thexifer.netWe analyzed Thexifer.net page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
thexifer.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value12.2 s
3/100
10%
Value3,190 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value22.1 s
1/100
10%
362 ms
604 ms
62 ms
172 ms
321 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Thexifer.net, 16% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (839 ms) belongs to the original domain Thexifer.net.
Page size can be reduced by 315.1 kB (24%)
1.3 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Thexifer.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.8 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 216.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 216.5 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 702 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thexifer.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (50%)
22
11
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TheXifer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
thexifer.net
362 ms
www.thexifer.net
604 ms
js
62 ms
adsbygoogle.js
172 ms
thexifer-min.css
321 ms
leaflet.css
348 ms
api.js
53 ms
_thexifer-global-tags-list-object.js
478 ms
_thexifer-min.js
839 ms
uc.js
33 ms
addthis_widget.js
38 ms
recaptcha__ru.js
123 ms
bg.webp
126 ms
ajax-loading.svg
124 ms
www.thexifer.net
232 ms
upload-logo-full.webp
205 ms
flickr-logo-full.webp
205 ms
dropbox-logo-full.webp
304 ms
gdrive-logo-full.webp
405 ms
icomoon.woff
408 ms
embed
154 ms
js
29 ms
search.js
4 ms
geometry.js
6 ms
main.js
11 ms
thexifer.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
thexifer.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
thexifer.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thexifer.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thexifer.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thexifer.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TheXifer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: