980 ms in total
16 ms
692 ms
272 ms
Click here to check amazing Thomas Eye content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thomaseye.com
Thomas Eye Group, founded in 1974, offers several eye care services in the Greater Atlanta Area. Check out all our services.
Visit thomaseye.comWe analyzed Thomaseye.com page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 964 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
thomaseye.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value1,510 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.096
90/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
16 ms
108 ms
31 ms
10 ms
22 ms
Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Thomaseye.com, 24% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (308 ms) belongs to the original domain Thomaseye.com.
Page size can be reduced by 129.1 kB (12%)
1.1 MB
956.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Thomaseye.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 612.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 123.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomas Eye images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomaseye.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (85%)
79
12
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Eye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thomaseye.com
16 ms
www.thomaseye.com
108 ms
css
31 ms
a11y-toolbar.css
10 ms
a11y.css
22 ms
a11y-fontsize.css
23 ms
wpa-style.css
27 ms
eac-components.min.css
32 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
36 ms
search-filter.min.css
28 ms
style.min.css
34 ms
theme.min.css
37 ms
header-footer.min.css
51 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
44 ms
post-5.css
49 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
41 ms
swiper.min.css
52 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
51 ms
post-7.css
54 ms
post-129.css
55 ms
eac-swiper.min.css
56 ms
acf-relationship.min.css
57 ms
post-267.css
61 ms
style.css
60 ms
ubermenu.min.css
63 ms
minimal.css
63 ms
all.min.css
75 ms
shiftnav.min.css
70 ms
font-awesome.min.css
78 ms
light.css
72 ms
css
37 ms
fontawesome.min.css
82 ms
brands.min.css
72 ms
frontend.js
93 ms
jquery.min.js
92 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
105 ms
wpgmza_data.js
108 ms
search-filter-elementor.js
108 ms
search-filter-build.min.js
109 ms
api.js
58 ms
widget.js
27 ms
widget-theme-elements.min.css
121 ms
solid.min.css
110 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
97 ms
fingerprint.min.js
95 ms
wpa-toolbar.min.js
123 ms
a11y.min.js
88 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
120 ms
eac-components.min.js
122 ms
core.min.js
112 ms
datepicker.min.js
121 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
108 ms
ubermenu.min.js
109 ms
longdesc.min.js
115 ms
wp-accessibility.min.js
118 ms
shiftnav.min.js
112 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
112 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
109 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
112 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
112 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
109 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
108 ms
hooks.min.js
106 ms
i18n.min.js
111 ms
frontend.min.js
116 ms
waypoints.min.js
111 ms
frontend.min.js
110 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
109 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
99 ms
gtm.js
245 ms
cropped-TEG-2023-HORIZ-CMYK100px_height.png
237 ms
cataract-icon.png
237 ms
family-icon.png
237 ms
lasik-icon.png
238 ms
oculoplastics-icon.png
237 ms
Pediatric.png
237 ms
retina-icon.png
308 ms
LOCATION-ICON.png
308 ms
MID-Optical-5-1.jpg
288 ms
who-we-are.jpg
288 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
214 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
267 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
289 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
289 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
287 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
289 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
289 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
287 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
291 ms
recaptcha__en.js
276 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
126 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
126 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf
30 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf
29 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf
28 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXh0ow.ttf
28 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXh0ow.ttf
27 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0ow.ttf
30 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf
32 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXh0ow.ttf
31 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16WXh0ow.ttf
30 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
28 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
120 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
119 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf
31 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjovoSmb2Rm.ttf
31 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf
120 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDISmb2Rm.ttf
123 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2Rm.ttf
121 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOmb2Rm.ttf
121 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf
121 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDIOmb2Rm.ttf
121 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoJYOmb2Rm.ttf
122 ms
thomaseye.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
thomaseye.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
thomaseye.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomaseye.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomaseye.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thomaseye.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Thomas Eye. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: