Tools & Wizards About Us
tinnitool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

tinnitool.com

Erfolgreichste Therapien zur Behandlung von Ohrensausen | Tinnitus Hilfe

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

284 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

186 ms

tinnitool.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tinnitool.com homepage info - get ready to check Tinnitool best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about tinnitool.com

Kein Tinnitus (auch Ohrensausen oder Ohrenrauschen genannt) ist gleich wie der andere. Wie finde ich nun heraus, welche Behandlung und welches Hilfsmittel für m...

Visit tinnitool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tinnitool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tinnitool.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tinnitool.com

284 ms

tinnitool.com

1920 ms

style.css

96 ms

style.min.css

193 ms

styles.css

272 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Tinnitool.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Tinnitool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.1 kB (59%)

Content Size

61.2 kB

After Optimization

25.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Tinnitool.com main page is 61.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 44.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 36.1 kB

  • Original 44.0 kB
  • After minification 39.4 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (68%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tinnitool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tinnitool.com

tinnitool.com

284 ms

tinnitool.com

tinnitool.com

1920 ms

style.css

style.css

96 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

193 ms

styles.css

styles.css

272 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

275 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

280 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

283 ms

main-ca8bbef416.css

main-ca8bbef416.css

468 ms

style.css

style.css

289 ms

added-styles.css

added-styles.css

362 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

363 ms

layout-styles.css

layout-styles.css

375 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

480 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

383 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

453 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

453 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

480 ms

add-to-cart-variation.js

add-to-cart-variation.js

480 ms

add-to-cart-variation.js

add-to-cart-variation.js

545 ms

js

js

64 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

544 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

560 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

563 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

564 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

573 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

635 ms

main-c9a31fe6d0.js

main-c9a31fe6d0.js

842 ms

cart_widget.min.js

cart_widget.min.js

653 ms

added-styles.css

added-styles.css

193 ms

ga.js

ga.js

88 ms

body-bg.gif

body-bg.gif

342 ms

header-fallback-dismark.png

header-fallback-dismark.png

522 ms

logo-de.png

logo-de.png

184 ms

logo-waves.png

logo-waves.png

325 ms

de.png

de.png

184 ms

fr.png

fr.png

236 ms

it.png

it.png

251 ms

gb.png

gb.png

252 ms

paddern.png

paddern.png

416 ms

bg-footer.jpg

bg-footer.jpg

346 ms

nunito-v9-latin-regular.woff

nunito-v9-latin-regular.woff

293 ms

nunito-v9-latin-300.woff

nunito-v9-latin-300.woff

363 ms

nunito-v9-latin-700.woff

nunito-v9-latin-700.woff

381 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

478 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

97 ms

Accessibility Review

tinnitool.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

tinnitool.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tinnitool.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tinnitool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tinnitool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tinnitool.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tinnitool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: