3.9 sec in total
248 ms
3.4 sec
227 ms
Welcome to tinnitool.com homepage info - get ready to check Tinnitool best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about tinnitool.com
Kein Tinnitus (auch Ohrensausen oder Ohrenrauschen genannt) ist gleich wie der andere. Wie finde ich nun heraus, welche Behandlung und welches Hilfsmittel für m...
Visit tinnitool.comWe analyzed Tinnitool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 248 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
tinnitool.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value5.1 s
61/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.5 s
48/100
10%
248 ms
2244 ms
220 ms
231 ms
230 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Tinnitool.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Freecounter.ch and 3% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Freecounter.ch.
Page size can be reduced by 210.8 kB (56%)
375.7 kB
164.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Tinnitool.com main page is 375.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 178.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tinnitool images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 118.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 56.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tinnitool.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (13%)
31
27
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tinnitool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
index.php
248 ms
visitor.asp
2244 ms
wScript.js
220 ms
nav.css
231 ms
ypSlideOutMenusC.js
230 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
568 ms
addToCart.js
231 ms
design.css
341 ms
analytics.js
25 ms
bg-body.gif
114 ms
bg-top.jpg
223 ms
logo.jpg
333 ms
bg-suche.png
114 ms
button-search.gif
114 ms
top_funcs_de_over.gif
115 ms
top_funcs_fr_is.gif
222 ms
top_funcs_it_is.gif
223 ms
top_funcs_en_is.gif
223 ms
bg-main-repeat.png
224 ms
bg-main-top.gif
331 ms
iso_logo.gif
333 ms
bg-nav1.png
330 ms
nav2-bottom.gif
332 ms
nav2-top.gif
331 ms
bg-nav1-alternativ.png
407 ms
arzt.jpg
408 ms
bg-footer.gif
413 ms
link-top.png
414 ms
link-mail.png
414 ms
link-print.png
414 ms
link-weiter.png
517 ms
link-sitemap.png
518 ms
design_print.css
115 ms
tinnitool.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tinnitool.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
tinnitool.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tinnitool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tinnitool.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
tinnitool.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tinnitool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: