Tools & Wizards About Us
toiletstool.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 43

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

toiletstool.net

Plastic Stool Chairs Manufacturers,China Kids Stool Suppliers

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

62 ms

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

813 ms

toiletstool.net screenshot

About Website

Visit toiletstool.net now to see the best up-to-date Toilet Stool content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about toiletstool.net

Huangyan Hexing Plastic Mould Co.,Ltd is a China plastic stool chairs suppliers and squat potty stools Suppliers,factory offer squat potty kids stools for sale

Visit toiletstool.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Toiletstool.net page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

toiletstool.net performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.197

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

toiletstool.net

62 ms

www.toiletstool.net

389 ms

autoptimize_e4de6666ec51c7679be43e8167fa525a.css

17 ms

autoptimize_0f4ea9f410458f2c3f88c2581842a0a8.css

63 ms

jquery.js

116 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Toiletstool.net, 4% (3 requests) were made to Player.polyv.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Rt.xiaoman.cn. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Collect-v6.51.la.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 136.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Toiletstool.net main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 69.2 kB

  • Original 106.6 kB
  • After minification 106.6 kB
  • After compression 37.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 36.1 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Toilet Stool images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 236.1 kB
  • After minification 236.1 kB
  • After compression 232.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 27.2 kB

  • Original 163.8 kB
  • After minification 158.0 kB
  • After compression 136.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Toiletstool.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (21%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

49

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Toilet Stool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

toiletstool.net

toiletstool.net

62 ms

www.toiletstool.net

www.toiletstool.net

389 ms

autoptimize_e4de6666ec51c7679be43e8167fa525a.css

autoptimize_e4de6666ec51c7679be43e8167fa525a.css

17 ms

autoptimize_0f4ea9f410458f2c3f88c2581842a0a8.css

autoptimize_0f4ea9f410458f2c3f88c2581842a0a8.css

63 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

116 ms

js-sdk-pro.min.js

js-sdk-pro.min.js

371 ms

analyze.js

analyze.js

730 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

12 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

1387 ms

player.js

player.js

360 ms

autoptimize_4e1ce9dd4cf05d0fffab955491caf453.js

autoptimize_4e1ce9dd4cf05d0fffab955491caf453.js

163 ms

css

css

51 ms

collect

collect

1490 ms

ditu.png

ditu.png

46 ms

logo.png

logo.png

53 ms

cn.jpg

cn.jpg

284 ms

us.jpg

us.jpg

294 ms

banner1.jpg

banner1.jpg

95 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

203 ms

banner3.jpg

banner3.jpg

64 ms

ad_tu1.png

ad_tu1.png

102 ms

ad_tu2.png

ad_tu2.png

73 ms

ad_tu3.png

ad_tu3.png

82 ms

ad_tu4.png

ad_tu4.png

103 ms

ad_tu5.png

ad_tu5.png

146 ms

ad_tu6.png

ad_tu6.png

154 ms

ad_tu7.png

ad_tu7.png

113 ms

ad_tu8.png

ad_tu8.png

124 ms

tu1.png

tu1.png

137 ms

honour.jpg

honour.jpg

147 ms

tu101.jpg

tu101.jpg

226 ms

tu102.jpg

tu102.jpg

158 ms

network.jpg

network.jpg

229 ms

hr0225.jpg

hr0225.jpg

175 ms

Ladder-toilet-stool.jpg

Ladder-toilet-stool.jpg

194 ms

hr0160.jpg

hr0160.jpg

205 ms

foo_logo.png

foo_logo.png

289 ms

foo_tu1.png

foo_tu1.png

226 ms

foo_tu2.png

foo_tu2.png

271 ms

foo_tu3.png

foo_tu3.png

237 ms

foo_tu4.png

foo_tu4.png

279 ms

ewm.png

ewm.png

249 ms

tao.png

tao.png

260 ms

mao.png

mao.png

272 ms

jd.png

jd.png

323 ms

foo_jt.png

foo_jt.png

282 ms

flags.png

flags.png

365 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

24 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

30 ms

icons.woff

icons.woff

388 ms

roboto-regular.ttf

roboto-regular.ttf

333 ms

siteSetting

siteSetting

1216 ms

polyvplayer.min.js

polyvplayer.min.js

53 ms

back1.jpg

back1.jpg

48 ms

back2.jpg

back2.jpg

93 ms

tu_tit.png

tu_tit.png

95 ms

roboto-bold.ttf

roboto-bold.ttf

125 ms

upgrade_flash_player.png

upgrade_flash_player.png

16 ms

js

js

56 ms

okki-chat-widget-sdk.iife.js

okki-chat-widget-sdk.iife.js

331 ms

report

report

342 ms

js

js

51 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

23 ms

collect

collect

53 ms

270 ms

report

report

374 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

52 ms

banner_tu1.png

banner_tu1.png

85 ms

banner_tu.png

banner_tu.png

83 ms

cn.jpg

cn.jpg

278 ms

us.jpg

us.jpg

253 ms

Adjustable-foot-rest-stool-with-massagerhr0478.jpg

Adjustable-foot-rest-stool-with-massagerhr0478.jpg

128 ms

Slanted-footrest-with-massager.jpg

Slanted-footrest-with-massager.jpg

121 ms

hr0330.jpg

hr0330.jpg

80 ms

Accessibility Review

toiletstool.net accessibility score

43

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

toiletstool.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

toiletstool.net SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Toiletstool.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Toiletstool.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

toiletstool.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Toilet Stool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: