Tools & Wizards About Us
touchprotector.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

touchprotector.com

Touchscreen LCD CRT Screen Overlays, Screen Protectors

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

22 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

308 ms

touchprotector.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Touchprotector content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about touchprotector.com

New Touch Screen Overlays and Screen Protectors for LCD and CRT Screens. Lowest Prices, Factory Warranty, Secure Ordering.

Visit touchprotector.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Touchprotector.com page load time and found that the first response time was 22 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

touchprotector.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,200 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.213

58/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

touchprotector.com

22 ms

Protective-Overlay.html

587 ms

clientside.mvc

66 ms

clientside.mvc

126 ms

clientside.mvc

186 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Touchprotector.com, 68% (21 requests) were made to Touchwindow.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (587 ms) relates to the external source Touchwindow.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 131.5 kB (36%)

Content Size

364.4 kB

After Optimization

232.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Touchprotector.com main page is 364.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 214.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 55.9 kB

  • Original 70.7 kB
  • After minification 69.7 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 79.5 kB
  • After minification 62.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Touchprotector needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 58.8 kB

  • Original 214.2 kB
  • After minification 213.3 kB
  • After compression 155.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 58.8 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (54%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Touchprotector. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

touchprotector.com

touchprotector.com

22 ms

Protective-Overlay.html

Protective-Overlay.html

587 ms

clientside.mvc

clientside.mvc

66 ms

clientside.mvc

clientside.mvc

126 ms

clientside.mvc

clientside.mvc

186 ms

all.php

all.php

471 ms

css

css

53 ms

js

js

66 ms

clientside.mvc

clientside.mvc

191 ms

vendor.min.js

vendor.min.js

255 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

257 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

257 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

39 ms

intersection-observer.js

intersection-observer.js

46 ms

1.js

1.js

33 ms

reb2b.js.gz

reb2b.js.gz

362 ms

t21_132x91.jpg

t21_132x91.jpg

72 ms

TW_3A_Icon.jpg

TW_3A_Icon.jpg

140 ms

button-specs.jpg

button-specs.jpg

73 ms

base_LCD_peel.jpg

base_LCD_peel.jpg

71 ms

img_credit-cards.png

img_credit-cards.png

72 ms

instantssl_trust_seal_sm_118x32.png

instantssl_trust_seal_sm_118x32.png

73 ms

amazon-connect-chat-interface-client.js

amazon-connect-chat-interface-client.js

85 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

83 ms

down-search-arrow.svg

down-search-arrow.svg

136 ms

Suivant.woff

Suivant.woff

138 ms

ElegantIcons.woff

ElegantIcons.woff

214 ms

Levels.ttf

Levels.ttf

144 ms

jquery.menu-aim.js

jquery.menu-aim.js

121 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

122 ms

Q-SCREEN-PROTECTOR_255x155.jpg

Q-SCREEN-PROTECTOR_255x155.jpg

67 ms

Accessibility Review

touchprotector.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

touchprotector.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

touchprotector.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Touchprotector.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Touchprotector.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

touchprotector.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Touchprotector. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: