Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

501 ms

tudorcollector.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tudorcollector content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tudorcollector.net

Visit tudorcollector.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Tudorcollector.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tudorcollector.net performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.054

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tudorcollector.net

1474 ms

tudorcollector.com

484 ms

js

149 ms

hrb6b.css

240 ms

css

176 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tudorcollector.net, 67% (20 requests) were made to Tudorcollector.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Tudorcollector.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 136.2 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

966.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Tudorcollector.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 854.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 316 B

  • Original 613 B
  • After minification 603 B
  • After compression 297 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 316 B or 52% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 32.2 kB

  • Original 854.9 kB
  • After minification 822.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tudorcollector images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 102.4 kB

  • Original 227.9 kB
  • After minification 223.4 kB
  • After compression 125.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.4 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 19.4 kB
  • After minification 19.4 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tudorcollector.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (46%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tudorcollector. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Best Practices

tudorcollector.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

tudorcollector.net SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tudorcollector.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Tudorcollector.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tudorcollector. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: