Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

Page Load Speed

679 ms in total

First Response

78 ms

Resources Loaded

601 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

turing.engineering screenshot

About Website

Visit turing.engineering now to see the best up-to-date Turing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about turing.engineering

Trusted by AI and enterprise leaders. Advance and deploy AGI with the most experienced genAI deployment and LLM training solutions from Turing.

Visit turing.engineering

Key Findings

We analyzed Turing.engineering page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 601 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

turing.engineering performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,120 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.2 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

turing.engineering

78 ms

www.turing.com

144 ms

onwalke-the-hope-Was-his-palthy-he-like-To-fight

109 ms

bb2ca144b5f1fb39.css

50 ms

ba162cdd609d4e74.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Turing.engineering, 57% (54 requests) were made to Turing.com and 41% (39 requests) were made to Images.prismic.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (298 ms) relates to the external source Turing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 145.7 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Turing.engineering main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 143.5 kB

  • Original 177.3 kB
  • After minification 177.3 kB
  • After compression 33.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Turing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 159 B

  • Original 97.2 kB
  • After minification 97.2 kB
  • After compression 97.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (59%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

38

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Turing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

turing.engineering accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

SEO Factors

turing.engineering SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Turing.engineering can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Turing.engineering main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Turing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: