679 ms in total
78 ms
601 ms
0 ms
Visit turing.engineering now to see the best up-to-date Turing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about turing.engineering
Trusted by AI and enterprise leaders. Advance and deploy AGI with the most experienced genAI deployment and LLM training solutions from Turing.
Visit turing.engineeringWe analyzed Turing.engineering page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 601 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
turing.engineering performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
83/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value4,120 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value16.2 s
5/100
10%
78 ms
144 ms
109 ms
50 ms
46 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Turing.engineering, 57% (54 requests) were made to Turing.com and 41% (39 requests) were made to Images.prismic.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (298 ms) relates to the external source Turing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 145.7 kB (6%)
2.5 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Turing.engineering main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 143.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Turing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 159 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (59%)
92
38
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Turing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
turing.engineering
78 ms
www.turing.com
144 ms
onwalke-the-hope-Was-his-palthy-he-like-To-fight
109 ms
bb2ca144b5f1fb39.css
50 ms
ba162cdd609d4e74.css
46 ms
982859d433fc0586.css
48 ms
9542d502bd12f182.css
54 ms
085ef4ed40cf87ba.css
58 ms
a8ea04edac1b90de.css
53 ms
4bcd55eb9b29421f.css
57 ms
de8a9ca5eb1e70a3.css
68 ms
17d1c6012e2e54f2.css
73 ms
9b31b0be5ad83e16.css
67 ms
a40ea264bed22da4.css
69 ms
4e92c4c34e2c7cc9.css
73 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
138 ms
4358-23e6c809f3c04421.js
116 ms
5490.bd4f0ee9cc394157.js
107 ms
3816.dbdd5435368a2e4a.js
110 ms
8550.52e7af989635b373.js
112 ms
9440.c57e908bd4280b1c.js
120 ms
3093.162aed315527d8ad.js
121 ms
2571.4ced39cb3e09f89d.js
126 ms
248.53e1e3617afff8a9.js
127 ms
746.8925f5eb617b84df.js
123 ms
4875.83e67c21264ecb19.js
179 ms
7553.a304e8d4c666c089.js
178 ms
9240.07ef43854fcaa190.js
290 ms
8295.9e52dceadec0ee37.js
292 ms
8840.d8821e56cea9d7c1.js
285 ms
5591.098685d0f8a14cab.js
298 ms
1633.59668e3f3b9cc7f5.js
292 ms
4939.d5ec418818051cb5.js
288 ms
502.e9f51e467c3fee35.js
292 ms
3355.d63cc3a0df972552.js
297 ms
5175.54895e034f7a2ca5.js
296 ms
467.72b3e1db145f5cf3.js
298 ms
ZqEI8R5LeNNTxdgE_OpenAI-white-340_viz_center.png
48 ms
ZqCxcB5LeNNTxchl_Gemini-300-viz-center.png
57 ms
ZoDvER5LeNNTwp6b_Meta.png
78 ms
ZoDvDx5LeNNTwp6Z_Anthropic.png
79 ms
ZoDwXB5LeNNTwp6p_Snowflake.png
91 ms
ZoDwWx5LeNNTwp6o_Character.ai.png
80 ms
ZoDwWh5LeNNTwp6n_Nvidia.png
90 ms
ZoDwWB5LeNNTwp6l_Augment.png
91 ms
Zp4DzB5LeNNTxVh8_img-1-.png
93 ms
ZqCWjB5LeNNTxcX6_OpenAI_black-236.png
88 ms
ZqCWix5LeNNTxcX5_GCP_black-332.png
91 ms
ZqCWih5LeNNTxcX4_Nvidia_black-253.png
90 ms
ZqCWiR5LeNNTxcX3_AWS_black-120.png
88 ms
ZqA2zB5LeNNTxcH4_llm-training.png
101 ms
Zpn1WR5LeNNTxSn-_Hero_Image-2-.png
94 ms
ZpmjJx5LeNNTxSZb_improving-llm-coding-accuracy-through-multifaceted-evaluation.png
101 ms
ZoN6CB5LeNNTwslJ_modelEvaluation_brandBlue_96px.png
98 ms
ZoN7IR5LeNNTwslN_coding_brandBlue_96px.png
98 ms
ZoN7Mx5LeNNTwslO_agentsFunctionsTooling_brandBlue_96px.png
95 ms
ZoN7Rx5LeNNTwslQ_reasoning_brandBlue_96px.png
100 ms
ZoN7Vh5LeNNTwslS_multimodality_brandBlue_96px.png
101 ms
ZoN7Yx5LeNNTwslU_dataAnalysis_brandBlue_96px.png
107 ms
ZoN7cB5LeNNTwslV_industryDomainKnowledge_brandBlue_96px.png
104 ms
ZoN7hx5LeNNTwslX_sftRlhfDpo_brandBlue_96px.png
104 ms
ZoN7lh5LeNNTwslY_STEMDomainKnowledge_brandBlue_96px.png
104 ms
ZoN7pB5LeNNTwslZ_factuality_brandBlue_96px.png
106 ms
ZoN7tR5LeNNTwsla_alignmentSafety_brandBlue_96px.png
105 ms
ZoN7wB5LeNNTwslb_activeLearning_brandBlue_96px.png
108 ms
ZoMUpB5LeNNTwsVI_thumb.jpg
116 ms
ZpmkPh5LeNNTxSZo_enhancing-llm-reasoning-and-coding-capabilities.png
111 ms
Zpn1UR5LeNNTxSn8_Hero_Image-3-.png
109 ms
Zpn1SB5LeNNTxSn6_Hero_Image-4-.png
161 ms
Zpn1WR5LeNNTxSn-_Hero_Image-2-.png
116 ms
Zpn1Xx5LeNNTxSoA_Hero_Image-1-.png
113 ms
ZlRo_ik0V36pXpyX_45400-BlogUpdates_01-104-95_Hero_1232-770.jpg
162 ms
ZfUzP3YkiKrtlKMx_UsingLLMCoding-Whitepaper-Mockup_WithPadding.webp
268 ms
3331.0074e38fc038858c.js
280 ms
9014.bd4b760c9fe5884d.js
257 ms
7103.b65d341e5bd16c08.js
262 ms
3270.605b02669036a3bb.js
259 ms
4250.357c79e4d322b2b4.js
253 ms
webpack-adbe09b6ac1a3080.js
254 ms
framework-3f3f864880ca1fc2.js
255 ms
main-9662dd5e19f6a052.js
264 ms
_app-9f7666495fbf5eee.js
258 ms
2659-e0c599b40a4fe57f.js
250 ms
index-0e8eeda45f4d453e.js
250 ms
Zf0Yoc68zyqdRp08_HomepageHero-1920x900.webp
100 ms
ZpdsOx5LeNNTxOLt_9cae8e6c8a0d052c4b5cda223f4b7dfe.png
205 ms
_buildManifest.js
234 ms
_ssgManifest.js
236 ms
Zf0agM68zyqdRp1N_Accelerate_1920x506.webp
95 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
219 ms
logo_256.webp
224 ms
image
218 ms
icon-play-button.svg
215 ms
image
226 ms
turing.engineering accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
turing.engineering SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Turing.engineering can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Turing.engineering main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
turing.engineering
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Turing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: