Tools & Wizards About Us
twostthomas.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

twostthomas.com

Yorkville Rentals Living in Bloor-Yorkville | Two St. Thomas

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

76 ms

Resources Loaded

896 ms

Page Rendered

194 ms

twostthomas.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to twostthomas.com homepage info - get ready to check Two St Thomas best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about twostthomas.com

Elevated finishes and features in every suite including quartz countertops, stainless steel appliances, and a custom island in each suite.

Visit twostthomas.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Twostthomas.com page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

twostthomas.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

twostthomas.com

76 ms

twostthomas.com

80 ms

www.twostthomas.com

339 ms

css2

31 ms

main.css

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Twostthomas.com, 13% (3 requests) were made to Assets.rentsync.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (339 ms) belongs to the original domain Twostthomas.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.0 kB (3%)

Content Size

904.2 kB

After Optimization

876.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Twostthomas.com main page is 904.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 664.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 26.8 kB

  • Original 38.6 kB
  • After minification 36.1 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 664.5 kB
  • After minification 663.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Two St Thomas images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 201.1 kB
  • After minification 201.1 kB
  • After compression 201.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Two St Thomas. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

twostthomas.com

twostthomas.com

76 ms

twostthomas.com

twostthomas.com

80 ms

www.twostthomas.com

www.twostthomas.com

339 ms

css2

css2

31 ms

main.css

main.css

37 ms

1718721086475_BGOLiving_V8_RGB_Logotype_White.png

1718721086475_BGOLiving_V8_RGB_Logotype_White.png

153 ms

main.js

main.js

106 ms

close.png

close.png

28 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

55 ms

prev.png

prev.png

56 ms

next.png

next.png

52 ms

1671064827590_Two_St_Thomas_-_Lobby_Concierge.jpg

1671064827590_Two_St_Thomas_-_Lobby_Concierge.jpg

133 ms

1670345678141_002.jpg

1670345678141_002.jpg

244 ms

print.css

print.css

26 ms

Gotham-Book.otf

Gotham-Book.otf

30 ms

Gotham-Medium.otf

Gotham-Medium.otf

34 ms

Gotham-XLight.otf

Gotham-XLight.otf

61 ms

Gotham-Light.otf

Gotham-Light.otf

53 ms

Gotham-Thin.otf

Gotham-Thin.otf

49 ms

Gotham-Bold.otf

Gotham-Bold.otf

61 ms

Gotham-Black.otf

Gotham-Black.otf

71 ms

Gotham-Ultra.otf

Gotham-Ultra.otf

86 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

75 ms

Accessibility Review

twostthomas.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

twostthomas.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

twostthomas.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Twostthomas.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Twostthomas.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

twostthomas.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Two St Thomas. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: