23.6 sec in total
403 ms
22.8 sec
396 ms
Click here to check amazing UB2000 content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ub2000.de
Übersetzungensbüro 2000 professional translation and interpreting services in over 100 languages and in all specialist fields. Native speaker principle. Your Partner for Translations in All Languages ...
Visit ub2000.deWe analyzed Ub2000.de page load time and found that the first response time was 403 ms and then it took 23.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
ub2000.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value3.7 s
58/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
403 ms
844 ms
100 ms
198 ms
298 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Ub2000.de, 13% (9 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) relates to the external source Meinungsmeister.de.
Page size can be reduced by 314.9 kB (35%)
903.5 kB
588.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Ub2000.de main page is 903.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 320.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 275.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 100.8 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 275.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. UB2000 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 29.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ub2000.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 51% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (46%)
67
36
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of UB2000. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ub2000.de
403 ms
844 ms
c8c8251fa8591cb28c40ad2ad166f930.js
100 ms
46ea87fa9ff0909c4cab73669ecfc01f.js
198 ms
animate.min.css
298 ms
style.min.css
400 ms
css
58 ms
slick.min.css
41 ms
select2.min.css
44 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
54 ms
main.css
405 ms
uc.js
59 ms
0678ee10d4913e26887e672731579503.js
402 ms
jquery.min.js
65 ms
slick.min.js
53 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
55 ms
jquery.lazy.min.js
60 ms
jquery.lazy.plugins.min.js
51 ms
select2.min.js
45 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
63 ms
app.js
545 ms
mm-swidget.js
19782 ms
css2
19 ms
phone.svg
171 ms
mail.svg
173 ms
langerror.svg
174 ms
en_GB.svg
175 ms
de_DE.svg
173 ms
tr_TR.svg
208 ms
ru_RU.svg
209 ms
logo.svg
210 ms
logowhite.svg
212 ms
arrowdown.svg
212 ms
union.svg
216 ms
attach.svg
293 ms
part6.png
296 ms
part4.png
299 ms
part3.png
300 ms
part2.png
300 ms
part1.png
311 ms
part8.png
393 ms
part5.png
395 ms
service1-min.png
596 ms
service2-min.png
497 ms
service3-min.png
399 ms
service4-min.png
518 ms
service5-min.png
492 ms
service6-min.png
494 ms
plus1.svg
498 ms
plus2.svg
593 ms
plus3.svg
594 ms
planet-earth.svg
596 ms
fb.svg
598 ms
marker.svg
620 ms
close.svg
691 ms
font
89 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
75 ms
phone.svg
300 ms
mail.svg
304 ms
logo.svg
302 ms
logowhite.svg
305 ms
attach.svg
306 ms
plus1.svg
308 ms
plus2.svg
400 ms
plus3.svg
402 ms
planet-earth.svg
402 ms
fb.svg
403 ms
marker.svg
404 ms
close.svg
410 ms
selectarrow.svg
474 ms
ub2000.de accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ub2000.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ub2000.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ub2000.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ub2000.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ub2000.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of UB2000. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: