777 ms in total
86 ms
625 ms
66 ms
Welcome to ui.live homepage info - get ready to check UI best content right away, or after learning these important things about ui.live
100% curated digital marketplace with a growing library of high quality UX/UI design resources and freebies for designers.
Visit ui.liveWe analyzed Ui.live page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 691 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
ui.live performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
5/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value5,960 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value19.2 s
2/100
10%
86 ms
38 ms
152 ms
64 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ui.live, 8% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Js.stripe.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (195 ms) relates to the external source Ui8.net.
Page size can be reduced by 65.7 kB (20%)
325.5 kB
259.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ui.live main page is 325.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 219.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. UI images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (45%)
33
18
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of UI. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ui8.net
86 ms
app.min.f7c1640.css
38 ms
js
152 ms
bugsnag.min.js
64 ms
vendor.min.5e167c1.js
59 ms
62 ms
email-decode.min.js
32 ms
TweenMax.min.js
129 ms
app_spa.min.1d52ef9.js
54 ms
api.js
147 ms
tapfiliate.js
59 ms
email.min.js
57 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
150 ms
sapiens.jpg
116 ms
peeps.jpg
114 ms
figma-prog.svg
115 ms
framer-prog.svg
112 ms
react-prog.svg
129 ms
blender-prog.svg
128 ms
c4d-prog.svg
129 ms
ps-prog.svg
128 ms
ai-prog.svg
127 ms
CircularXX-Book.woff
130 ms
CircularXX-Regular.woff
194 ms
CircularXX-Medium.woff
195 ms
recaptcha__en.js
118 ms
channel.html
49 ms
js
88 ms
js
89 ms
sessions.bugsnag.com
144 ms
notify.bugsnag.com
144 ms
notify.bugsnag.com
156 ms
notify.bugsnag.com
144 ms
46 ms
26 ms
outer.html
11 ms
lfhojexq
33 ms
inner.html
19 ms
ui.live accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ui.live best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ui.live SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ui.live can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ui.live main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ui.live
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of UI. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: