Tools & Wizards About Us
uppermethod.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

uppermethod.com

Untapped Potential Probe for Expertise Reveal - UPPER Method

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

405 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

230 ms

uppermethod.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing UPPER Method content for Switzerland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about uppermethod.com

Your team have got some untapped potential. Let's find it out.It's all about blind spots. Detect them and you will succeed.

Visit uppermethod.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Uppermethod.com page load time and found that the first response time was 405 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

uppermethod.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

uppermethod.com

405 ms

style.min.css

83 ms

theme.min.css

162 ms

header-footer.min.css

241 ms

jet-elements.css

335 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Uppermethod.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (817 ms) belongs to the original domain Uppermethod.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 162.5 kB (18%)

Content Size

912.6 kB

After Optimization

750.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Uppermethod.com main page is 912.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 284.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 60.9 kB

  • Original 74.0 kB
  • After minification 72.5 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 283.5 kB
  • After minification 276.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. UPPER Method images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 32.3 kB

  • Original 284.7 kB
  • After minification 284.7 kB
  • After compression 252.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 62.3 kB

  • Original 270.4 kB
  • After minification 270.4 kB
  • After compression 208.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Uppermethod.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 62.3 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (85%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of UPPER Method. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

uppermethod.com

uppermethod.com

405 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

83 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

162 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

241 ms

jet-elements.css

jet-elements.css

335 ms

jet-elements-skin.css

jet-elements-skin.css

259 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

262 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

347 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

265 ms

post-13.css

post-13.css

319 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

499 ms

uael-frontend.min.css

uael-frontend.min.css

516 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

355 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

401 ms

global.css

global.css

415 ms

post-11.css

post-11.css

429 ms

post-68.css

post-68.css

434 ms

post-71.css

post-71.css

480 ms

css

css

31 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

495 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

510 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

513 ms

js

js

90 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

652 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

645 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

645 ms

lottie.min.js

lottie.min.js

725 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

651 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

651 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

666 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

663 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

735 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

737 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

736 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

750 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

751 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

812 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

815 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

817 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

752 ms

jet-elements.min.js

jet-elements.min.js

679 ms

lftracker_v1_lAxoEaKBqDD4OYGd.js

lftracker_v1_lAxoEaKBqDD4OYGd.js

420 ms

UpperMethod_Corretto_Quadrato.gif

UpperMethod_Corretto_Quadrato.gif

293 ms

test.png

test.png

357 ms

potenziale.png

potenziale.png

355 ms

consulente.png

consulente.png

357 ms

hotjar-2142815.js

hotjar-2142815.js

147 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

412 ms

2sDfZG1Wl4LcnbuKjk0j.ttf

2sDfZG1Wl4LcnbuKjk0j.ttf

20 ms

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCJW8zaGW8.ttf

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCJW8zaGW8.ttf

26 ms

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCNWgzaGW8.ttf

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCNWgzaGW8.ttf

35 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

347 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

269 ms

modules.a4fd7e5489291affcf56.js

modules.a4fd7e5489291affcf56.js

28 ms

Accessibility Review

uppermethod.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

uppermethod.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

uppermethod.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Uppermethod.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Uppermethod.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

uppermethod.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of UPPER Method. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: