Tools & Wizards About Us
upstream.consulting screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

upstream.consulting

Georgia Grant Consultants For Nonprofits | Upstream Consulting

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

84 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

293 ms

upstream.consulting screenshot

About Website

Welcome to upstream.consulting homepage info - get ready to check Upstream best content right away, or after learning these important things about upstream.consulting

We help health and social service nonprofits with a stress-free solution to winning more grants, finding grants, and grant training.

Visit upstream.consulting

Key Findings

We analyzed Upstream.consulting page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

upstream.consulting performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

upstream.consulting

84 ms

upstream.consulting

485 ms

showit.css

19 ms

jquery.min.js

61 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

1835 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Upstream.consulting, 16% (3 requests) were made to Lib.showit.co and 11% (2 requests) were made to Wpcc.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Wpcc.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 392.7 kB (46%)

Content Size

857.8 kB

After Optimization

465.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Upstream.consulting main page is 857.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 470.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 391.8 kB

  • Original 470.5 kB
  • After minification 469.8 kB
  • After compression 78.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 391.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 211.5 kB
  • After minification 211.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Upstream images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 836 B

  • Original 173.5 kB
  • After minification 173.5 kB
  • After compression 172.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 23 B

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 2.2 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Upstream.consulting has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (45%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Upstream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

upstream.consulting

upstream.consulting

84 ms

upstream.consulting

upstream.consulting

485 ms

showit.css

showit.css

19 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

61 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

1835 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

1834 ms

css

css

58 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

43 ms

showit-lib.min.js

showit-lib.min.js

2 ms

showit.min.js

showit.min.js

13 ms

autoptimize_6d5b9c15efd33cac91755efd0867d175.js

autoptimize_6d5b9c15efd33cac91755efd0867d175.js

172 ms

ck.5.js

ck.5.js

74 ms

index.js

index.js

141 ms

index.js

index.js

191 ms

24-signs-that-youre-grant-ready-1568x1045.jpg

24-signs-that-youre-grant-ready-1568x1045.jpg

352 ms

four.jpg

four.jpg

234 ms

font

font

121 ms

font

font

141 ms

3affdd_0_0.woff

3affdd_0_0.woff

32 ms

Accessibility Review

upstream.consulting accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

upstream.consulting best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

upstream.consulting SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Upstream.consulting can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Upstream.consulting main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

upstream.consulting

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Upstream. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: