3.8 sec in total
252 ms
3.2 sec
282 ms
Welcome to uship2.com homepage info - get ready to check Uship 2 best content right away, or after learning these important things about uship2.com
Bénéficiez jusqu'à 75% de réduction pour vos envois de colis comparez les meilleures offres des transporteurs express comme DHL, UPS et payez moins cher
Visit uship2.comWe analyzed Uship2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
uship2.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value13.5 s
0/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value2,290 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.151
75/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
252 ms
12 ms
219 ms
217 ms
61 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Uship2.com, 83% (76 requests) were made to Upela.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Upela.com.
Page size can be reduced by 134.2 kB (36%)
377.9 kB
243.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Uship2.com main page is 377.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 128.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Uship 2 needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Uship2.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (56%)
57
25
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Uship 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
uship2.com
252 ms
www.upela.com
12 ms
fr
219 ms
217 ms
ec1b2f3dde.js
61 ms
bootstrap.min.css
197 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.min.css
128 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
232 ms
select2.min.css
216 ms
custom-select20211025.css
219 ms
custom-select-responsive20211025.css
193 ms
custom-address20211025.css
318 ms
style20231020.css
377 ms
login20211025.css
389 ms
responsive20231010.css
413 ms
config20220930.js
441 ms
cookie-util20211025.js
468 ms
jquery-3.5.1.min.js
510 ms
popper-1.14.7.min.js
560 ms
bootstrap.min.js
596 ms
select2.min.js
641 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.min.js
626 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.fr.min.js
658 ms
owl.carousel.js
717 ms
custom-select20211025.js
661 ms
script20230627.js
711 ms
custom-address20211105.js
844 ms
app20230627.js
751 ms
appLogin20230918.js
852 ms
cookiebar.js
845 ms
upela-pricer.js
295 ms
css
32 ms
css
48 ms
logo-upela.svg
472 ms
flag-fr.svg
477 ms
flag-en.svg
533 ms
flag-es.svg
524 ms
flag-de.svg
590 ms
flag-it.svg
513 ms
LOGO-UPS.webp
677 ms
LOGO-DHL.webp
664 ms
LOGO-CHRONO.webp
708 ms
LOGO-SODEXI.webp
719 ms
LOGO-FEDEX.webp
732 ms
LOGO-MR.webp
788 ms
LOGO-TNT.webp
764 ms
LOGO-DPD.webp
857 ms
LOGO_COLISSIMO.webp
938 ms
LOGO-VIAPOST.webp
938 ms
LOGO-HESNAULT.webp
835 ms
LOGO-E2G.webp
998 ms
LOGO-FLASH.webp
998 ms
LOGO-COLISWEB.webp
1174 ms
LOGO-CORREOS.webp
1175 ms
LOGO-PUNTO.webp
1177 ms
gtm.js
102 ms
LOGO-SEUR.webp
1112 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
18 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
26 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
33 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
41 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
42 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
41 ms
comparateur-transporteurs.webp
1098 ms
logo-la-petite-friture.webp
1058 ms
logo-hindbag.webp
1101 ms
logo-tammy-benjamin.webp
1075 ms
Main-sauvage.webp
972 ms
Nilai-paris.webp
1051 ms
logo-cernunos.webp
1087 ms
new-douanes.png
1024 ms
new-expedier.png
1076 ms
new-suivi.png
1144 ms
new-contact.png
952 ms
new-connecteurs.png
1076 ms
loader.js
436 ms
prestashop.svg
1082 ms
X27D7D0EE881086E7CAB9E68398B819DF.js
49 ms
woo.svg
1013 ms
shopify.svg
1072 ms
ebay.svg
1029 ms
mirakl.svg
1113 ms
priceminister.svg
1147 ms
new-envoi-contact.png
1081 ms
new-envoi-masse.png
1015 ms
new-parametres.png
1047 ms
new-envoi-fichier.png
1019 ms
new-drop-shipping.png
1113 ms
logo-upela-footer.svg
1131 ms
header-img.webp
1099 ms
sdk.a03098dda5733a9df9e0a51042b711775000f2c6.js
6 ms
ui-gdpr-en-web.a03098dda5733a9df9e0a51042b711775000f2c6.js
153 ms
uship2.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
uship2.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
uship2.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Uship2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Uship2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
uship2.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Uship 2. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: