Tools & Wizards About Us
usipl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 47

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

usipl.com

Sugar Plant Technology providers | Sugar Equipment manufacturers | USIPL

Page Load Speed

8.8 sec in total

First Response

717 ms

Resources Loaded

7.7 sec

Page Rendered

432 ms

usipl.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing USIPL content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about usipl.com

USIPL is provide the best sugar plant technology for equipment manufacturing to integrated sugar plants & specially established for executing the Group’s EPC Projects across the globe.

Visit usipl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Usipl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 717 ms and then it took 8.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

usipl.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.358

30/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

usipl.com

717 ms

www.usipl.com

702 ms

www.usipl.com

962 ms

gtm.js

45 ms

bootstrap.css

927 ms

Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Usipl.com, 14% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Usipl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (28%)

Content Size

5.9 MB

After Optimization

4.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Usipl.com main page is 5.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 76.1 kB

  • Original 86.0 kB
  • After minification 68.2 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.8 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 696.2 kB

  • Original 4.7 MB
  • After minification 4.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, USIPL needs image optimization as it can save up to 696.2 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 422.5 kB

  • Original 533.2 kB
  • After minification 486.9 kB
  • After compression 110.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 422.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 468.2 kB

  • Original 525.4 kB
  • After minification 441.2 kB
  • After compression 57.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Usipl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 468.2 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (26%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

64

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of USIPL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

usipl.com

usipl.com

717 ms

www.usipl.com

www.usipl.com

702 ms

www.usipl.com

www.usipl.com

962 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

45 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

927 ms

style.css

style.css

1372 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

696 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1162 ms

amazingslider.js

amazingslider.js

1657 ms

amazingslider-1.css

amazingslider-1.css

942 ms

initslider-1.js

initslider-1.js

946 ms

js

js

91 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1161 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

1183 ms

jquery.fancybox-media.js

jquery.fancybox-media.js

1182 ms

owl.js

owl.js

1631 ms

wow.js

wow.js

1398 ms

appear.js

appear.js

1414 ms

script.js

script.js

1425 ms

css

css

31 ms

css

css

42 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

235 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

264 ms

animate.css

animate.css

737 ms

owl.css

owl.css

294 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

467 ms

hover.css

hover.css

729 ms

js

js

90 ms

usipl-logo-1.png

usipl-logo-1.png

279 ms

image-1.jpg

image-1.jpg

489 ms

image-2.jpg

image-2.jpg

477 ms

image-3.jpg

image-3.jpg

916 ms

image-4.jpg

image-4.jpg

1204 ms

image-1-tn.jpg

image-1-tn.jpg

278 ms

image-2-tn.jpg

image-2-tn.jpg

480 ms

image-3-tn.jpg

image-3-tn.jpg

491 ms

image-4-tn.jpg

image-4-tn.jpg

727 ms

ab1.jpg

ab1.jpg

723 ms

ab2.jpg

ab2.jpg

729 ms

ab3.jpg

ab3.jpg

963 ms

ab4.jpg

ab4.jpg

965 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

978 ms

project-thum1.jpg

project-thum1.jpg

967 ms

project-thum2.jpg

project-thum2.jpg

1149 ms

project-thum3.jpg

project-thum3.jpg

1215 ms

project-thum4.jpg

project-thum4.jpg

1200 ms

project-thum5.jpg

project-thum5.jpg

1216 ms

1094186565wk4.jpg

1094186565wk4.jpg

1221 ms

project-thum7.jpg

project-thum7.jpg

1381 ms

project-thum8.jpg

project-thum8.jpg

1436 ms

1822473108_DSC4108.JPG

1822473108_DSC4108.JPG

1452 ms

21233918363.jpg

21233918363.jpg

1684 ms

1026626031ra_sb_coupling.jpg

1026626031ra_sb_coupling.jpg

1457 ms

3217611491.jpg

3217611491.jpg

1465 ms

1193258481panipat.jpg

1193258481panipat.jpg

1615 ms

891062079Dangote%20Sugar.png

891062079Dangote%20Sugar.png

1672 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

1697 ms

riopaila.jpg

riopaila.jpg

1707 ms

ethiopia.jpg

ethiopia.jpg

1713 ms

Ambalika-Sugar.jpg

Ambalika-Sugar.jpg

1850 ms

whitenile.jpg

whitenile.jpg

1914 ms

1.png

1.png

1921 ms

2.png

2.png

1936 ms

3.png

3.png

1866 ms

4.png

4.png

1680 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

20 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

32 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

57 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

69 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

72 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

71 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

71 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

70 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

69 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

70 ms

fontawesome-webfont914c.woff

fontawesome-webfont914c.woff

1811 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

101 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

99 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

99 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

100 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

100 ms

flaticon.svg

flaticon.svg

1926 ms

flaticon.woff

flaticon.woff

1682 ms

5.png

5.png

1693 ms

6.png

6.png

1692 ms

7.png

7.png

1473 ms

8.png

8.png

1598 ms

9.png

9.png

1685 ms

10.png

10.png

1517 ms

11.png

11.png

1469 ms

12.png

12.png

1472 ms

13.png

13.png

1595 ms

14.png

14.png

1664 ms

15.png

15.png

1494 ms

16.png

16.png

1452 ms

27.png

27.png

1459 ms

17.png

17.png

1461 ms

29.jpg

29.jpg

1579 ms

30.jpg

30.jpg

1655 ms

31.jpg

31.jpg

1499 ms

32.png

32.png

1471 ms

33.png

33.png

1690 ms

34.jpg

34.jpg

1458 ms

cl2.png

cl2.png

1564 ms

cl1.png

cl1.png

1497 ms

playvideo-64-64-0.png

playvideo-64-64-0.png

1496 ms

carouselarrows-32-32-0.png

carouselarrows-32-32-0.png

1468 ms

Accessibility Review

usipl.com accessibility score

47

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

usipl.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

usipl.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Usipl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Usipl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

usipl.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of USIPL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: