Tools & Wizards About Us
test.vesica.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

test.vesica.org

Vesica Institute for Holistic Studies in Biogeometry + Vibrational Science

Page Load Speed

375 ms in total

First Response

60 ms

Resources Loaded

256 ms

Page Rendered

59 ms

test.vesica.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to test.vesica.org homepage info - get ready to check Test Vesica best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about test.vesica.org

Learn to use the power of biogeometry, spiritual science, vibrational science, holistic healing, crystals & gemstones, healing frequencies, aligning shakras…

Visit test.vesica.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Test.vesica.org page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 315 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

test.vesica.org performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.258

48/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

test.vesica.org

60 ms

test.vesica.org

133 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

49 ms

main.js

12 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Test.vesica.org, 25% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (133 ms) belongs to the original domain Test.vesica.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 813 B (19%)

Content Size

4.3 kB

After Optimization

3.5 kB

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Test.vesica.org main page is 4.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 794 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.7 kB
  • After compression 930 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 794 B or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Test.vesica.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Test Vesica. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

test.vesica.org

test.vesica.org

60 ms

test.vesica.org

test.vesica.org

133 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

49 ms

main.js

main.js

12 ms

Accessibility Review

test.vesica.org accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

test.vesica.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

test.vesica.org SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Test.vesica.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Test.vesica.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

test.vesica.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Test Vesica. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: