Tools & Wizards About Us
vidcom.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    33% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

vidcom.in

AEPS, Micro ATM, Recharge & Bill Pay, Money Transfer Services Provider in India

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

569 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

289 ms

vidcom.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to vidcom.in homepage info - get ready to check Vidcom best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about vidcom.in

Vidcom is India largest payment service provider & solutions company with the biggest retail network for AEPS, Money Transfers, Recharges, Bill Payments, Micro ATM, PAN Card Service, etc

Visit vidcom.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Vidcom.in page load time and found that the first response time was 569 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vidcom.in performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.361

30/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vidcom.in

569 ms

bootstrap.css

542 ms

style.css

520 ms

responsive.css

535 ms

slick.css

538 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Vidcom.in, 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Vidcom.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 124.5 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vidcom.in main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 38.0 kB

  • Original 42.7 kB
  • After minification 25.2 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.4 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 50.1 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vidcom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 17.2 kB

  • Original 80.6 kB
  • After minification 80.6 kB
  • After compression 63.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.2 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

  • Original 52.4 kB
  • After minification 48.3 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vidcom.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (47%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vidcom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vidcom.in

vidcom.in

569 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

542 ms

style.css

style.css

520 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

535 ms

slick.css

slick.css

538 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

551 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

552 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

780 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

801 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

804 ms

js

js

68 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

898 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1078 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

1118 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1046 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

1073 ms

bootstrap-select.min.js

bootstrap-select.min.js

1340 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

31 ms

css

css

35 ms

css2

css2

40 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

9 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

85 ms

logo.png

logo.png

436 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

1788 ms

logo-banner.png

logo-banner.png

791 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

2168 ms

banner3.jpg

banner3.jpg

2169 ms

airtel.png

airtel.png

585 ms

fino.png

fino.png

792 ms

paytm.png

paytm.png

813 ms

razorpay.png

razorpay.png

1056 ms

just-recharge.png

just-recharge.png

1059 ms

indicore.png

indicore.png

1091 ms

testimonial1.jpg

testimonial1.jpg

1589 ms

testimonial2.jpg

testimonial2.jpg

1593 ms

testimonial4.jpg

testimonial4.jpg

1356 ms

google-play.png

google-play.png

1626 ms

insta.png

insta.png

1856 ms

linkdin.png

linkdin.png

1861 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

1894 ms

fb.png

fb.png

2044 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

2122 ms

whatsapp.png

whatsapp.png

2127 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4OWaA.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4OWaA.ttf

85 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSWaA.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSWaA.ttf

83 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

75 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

73 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

74 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

74 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

89 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

90 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

30 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

1736 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

1877 ms

slick.woff

slick.woff

1956 ms

483662202873704

483662202873704

60 ms

Accessibility Review

vidcom.in accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vidcom.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vidcom.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vidcom.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vidcom.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vidcom.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vidcom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: