Tools & Wizards About Us
videocutter.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

videocutter.in

Online Video Cutter Free - Without Watermark - MP4 Cutter

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

178 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

272 ms

videocutter.in screenshot

About Website

Visit videocutter.in now to see the best up-to-date Video Cutter content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about videocutter.in

Online Video Cutter Website is a Free tool without watermark, Editor and Trimmer. You can cut, join, split, trim and convert. Online MP4 Cutter & Trimmer.

Visit videocutter.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Videocutter.in page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

videocutter.in performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,390 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

videocutter.in

178 ms

adsbygoogle.js

144 ms

js

106 ms

gtm.js

192 ms

bootstrap.css

438 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Videocutter.in, 18% (3 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 12% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (843 ms) belongs to the original domain Videocutter.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 560.8 kB (58%)

Content Size

969.2 kB

After Optimization

408.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Videocutter.in main page is 969.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 689.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 15.9 kB
  • After minification 14.5 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 7.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Video Cutter needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 326.8 kB

  • Original 689.8 kB
  • After minification 689.8 kB
  • After compression 363.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 326.8 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 221.5 kB

  • Original 254.7 kB
  • After minification 208.8 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videocutter.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 221.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (64%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Video Cutter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

videocutter.in

videocutter.in

178 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

144 ms

js

js

106 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

192 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

438 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

189 ms

style.css

style.css

191 ms

styles.css

styles.css

120 ms

index.php

index.php

124 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

843 ms

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

191 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

399 ms

bg.png

bg.png

85 ms

logo_sm.png

logo_sm.png

86 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

47 ms

ads

ads

52 ms

ads

ads

48 ms

Accessibility Review

videocutter.in accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

videocutter.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

videocutter.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videocutter.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Videocutter.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

videocutter.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Video Cutter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: