Tools & Wizards About Us
videoeditingacademy.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

videoeditingacademy.com

videoeditingacademy.com

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

217 ms

videoeditingacademy.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to videoeditingacademy.com homepage info - get ready to check Videoeditingacademy best content right away, or after learning these important things about videoeditingacademy.com

Forsale Lander

Visit videoeditingacademy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Videoeditingacademy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

videoeditingacademy.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.4 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.084

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

76/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

videoeditingacademy.com

36 ms

www.videoeditingacademy.com

177 ms

www.videoeditingacademy.com

282 ms

3566091532-css_bundle_v2.css

68 ms

font-awesome.min.css

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Videoeditingacademy.com, 55% (23 requests) were made to 1.bp.blogspot.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Blogger.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (770 ms) relates to the external source 1.bp.blogspot.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 320.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Videoeditingacademy.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 82.6 kB

  • Original 107.2 kB
  • After minification 106.4 kB
  • After compression 24.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 237.0 kB

  • Original 3.8 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Videoeditingacademy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 387 B

  • Original 124.9 kB
  • After minification 124.9 kB
  • After compression 124.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 165 B

  • Original 9.0 kB
  • After minification 9.0 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videoeditingacademy.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (15%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videoeditingacademy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

videoeditingacademy.com

videoeditingacademy.com

36 ms

www.videoeditingacademy.com

www.videoeditingacademy.com

177 ms

www.videoeditingacademy.com

www.videoeditingacademy.com

282 ms

3566091532-css_bundle_v2.css

3566091532-css_bundle_v2.css

68 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

70 ms

css

css

73 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

60 ms

classic-10_7.css

classic-10_7.css

60 ms

42 ms

embed.js

embed.js

67 ms

120656894-widgets.js

120656894-widgets.js

154 ms

FOR-WEB-%2528Transparent%2529.png

FOR-WEB-%2528Transparent%2529.png

307 ms

Ur9qexsVd6Y

Ur9qexsVd6Y

1 ms

70---Tint-1.png

70---Tint-1.png

545 ms

80---Tint-2.png

80---Tint-2.png

381 ms

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

314 ms

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

355 ms

Website%2B2.jpg

Website%2B2.jpg

356 ms

Website%2B3.jpg

Website%2B3.jpg

475 ms

Website%2B1.jpg

Website%2B1.jpg

577 ms

n3hfeQanFQ0

n3hfeQanFQ0

1 ms

this.jpg

this.jpg

457 ms

this.jpg

this.jpg

498 ms

rrrr.jpg

rrrr.jpg

623 ms

200.jpg

200.jpg

645 ms

rrrr3.jpg

rrrr3.jpg

655 ms

kiZk2oj727E

kiZk2oj727E

1 ms

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

618 ms

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

678 ms

essential%2Bgraphics.jpg

essential%2Bgraphics.jpg

770 ms

track.jpg

track.jpg

761 ms

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

586 ms

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

744 ms

Thumbnail.png

Thumbnail.png

748 ms

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

Thumbnail---Website.jpg

617 ms

Thumbnail---Website-2.png

Thumbnail---Website-2.png

746 ms

this.jpg

this.jpg

647 ms

font

font

39 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

28 ms

font

font

42 ms

authorization.css

authorization.css

103 ms

authorization.css

authorization.css

24 ms

Accessibility Review

videoeditingacademy.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

videoeditingacademy.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

videoeditingacademy.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videoeditingacademy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Videoeditingacademy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

videoeditingacademy.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Videoeditingacademy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: