5.5 sec in total
405 ms
3.9 sec
1.2 sec
Visit videxp.com now to see the best up-to-date Videxp content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about videxp.com
This website is for sale! videxp.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, videxp.com has it a...
Visit videxp.comWe analyzed Videxp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 405 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
videxp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value2.6 s
87/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.197
62/100
15%
Value3.8 s
90/100
10%
405 ms
794 ms
201 ms
42 ms
383 ms
Our browser made a total of 123 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Videxp.com, 10% (12 requests) were made to Vk.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Videxp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 539.8 kB (35%)
1.5 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Videxp.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 879.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 145.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Videxp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 308.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 308.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videxp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (29%)
116
82
The browser has sent 116 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videxp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
videxp.com
405 ms
www.videxp.com
794 ms
videxpmain.css
201 ms
adsbygoogle.js
42 ms
openapi.js
383 ms
platform.js
76 ms
share.js
43 ms
3_0_A8A8A8FF_888888FF_1_pageviews
304 ms
88x31_3.gif
657 ms
srchbtn.png
137 ms
NY.jpg
299 ms
videxplogo.png
400 ms
slidebar1.png
303 ms
menu-grey-line.png
300 ms
foto.php
394 ms
foto.php
398 ms
foto.php
525 ms
foto.php
605 ms
foto.php
525 ms
foto.php
603 ms
foto.php
610 ms
foto.php
634 ms
foto.php
862 ms
foto.php
861 ms
foto.php
861 ms
foto.php
885 ms
foto.php
885 ms
foto.php
890 ms
foto.php
1175 ms
foto.php
1121 ms
foto.php
1091 ms
foto.php
1161 ms
foto.php
1320 ms
foto.php
1279 ms
foto.php
1315 ms
foto.php
1418 ms
foto.php
1385 ms
foto.php
1452 ms
ca-pub-4062237898676767.js
43 ms
zrt_lookup.html
42 ms
show_ads_impl.js
54 ms
ads
487 ms
osd.js
20 ms
upload.gif
141 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
32 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
34 ms
fastbutton
130 ms
widget_community.php
259 ms
foto.php
1268 ms
foto.php
1343 ms
foto.php
1345 ms
foto.php
1397 ms
foto.php
1448 ms
foto.php
1465 ms
foto.php
1472 ms
foto.php
1593 ms
context.js
279 ms
postmessageRelay
87 ms
foto.php
1625 ms
foto.php
1521 ms
watch.js
22 ms
foto.php
1622 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
48 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
43 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
84 ms
ads
273 ms
1077434459-postmessagerelay.js
55 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
59 ms
b-share-icon.png
33 ms
watch.js
5 ms
foto.php
1497 ms
foto.php
1548 ms
foto.php
1683 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
22 ms
loader_nav19239_3.js
138 ms
lite.css
145 ms
lite.js
521 ms
lang3_0.js
407 ms
widget_community.css
406 ms
xdm.js
406 ms
al_community.js
406 ms
foto.php
1554 ms
context_static_r1084.js
367 ms
foto.php
1813 ms
foto.php
1632 ms
foto.php
1632 ms
suggestion_autolayout_V2_10.css
42 ms
suggestion_autolayout_V2_10.js
53 ms
layout_engine.js
112 ms
abg.js
75 ms
foto.php
1623 ms
m_js_controller.js
32 ms
foto.php
1775 ms
favicon
190 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
183 ms
mobile_unified_button_icon_white.png
167 ms
s
151 ms
x_button_blue2.png
146 ms
9095478577218208008
40 ms
foto.php
1461 ms
foto.php
1673 ms
foto.php
1659 ms
j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js
9 ms
foto.php
1600 ms
120782
176 ms
watch.js
0 ms
lG8NLYpRwz8.jpg
386 ms
jFfHKD5Uk40.jpg
388 ms
WLfJXvhzILs.jpg
393 ms
4ZaJi4M2SZU.jpg
261 ms
-DSvf_H7QaM.jpg
388 ms
z1LhewQDO3s.jpg
386 ms
Fk4l1p43ohM.jpg
275 ms
BVpsXPBH_3M.jpg
393 ms
N8hgclh7spI.jpg
393 ms
Os_fuXsXqgk.jpg
427 ms
4TtZzm9zGtM.jpg
425 ms
2supfPFge0E.jpg
415 ms
0dfGtFMF53U.jpg
294 ms
camera_50.png
149 ms
w_logo.png
140 ms
english-for-free.com
296 ms
activeview
20 ms
videxp.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
videxp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
videxp.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videxp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Videxp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
videxp.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Videxp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: