Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

259 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

533 ms

visitmarrbury.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Visitmarrbury content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about visitmarrbury.co.uk

Visit visitmarrbury.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Visitmarrbury.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 259 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

visitmarrbury.co.uk performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

76/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

visitmarrbury.co.uk

259 ms

www.visitmarrbury.co.uk

427 ms

bootstrap.min.css

374 ms

style.css

696 ms

logo.png

425 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Visitmarrbury.co.uk, 41% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (932 ms) belongs to the original domain Visitmarrbury.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 581.0 kB (34%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Visitmarrbury.co.uk main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 12.4 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.6 kB, which is 45% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 235.3 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Visitmarrbury needs image optimization as it can save up to 235.3 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 334.9 kB

  • Original 368.6 kB
  • After minification 233.2 kB
  • After compression 33.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visitmarrbury.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 334.9 kB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visitmarrbury. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

visitmarrbury.co.uk accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Best Practices

visitmarrbury.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

visitmarrbury.co.uk SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    LA

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visitmarrbury.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Latin is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Visitmarrbury.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Visitmarrbury. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: