Tools & Wizards About Us
visualsitemaps.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

visualsitemaps.com

Visual Sitemaps | Generate & Plan Website Architecture + Flows

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

813 ms

visualsitemaps.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Visual Sitemaps content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about visualsitemaps.com

Generate visual sitemaps + screenshots for live & staging websites. Run Audits > Plan Content > Create Flows for SEO, UX, and Competitor Analysis.

Visit visualsitemaps.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Visualsitemaps.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

visualsitemaps.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,150 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.148

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

visualsitemaps.com

46 ms

visualsitemaps.com

2795 ms

css

80 ms

style.css

37 ms

init.min.js

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Visualsitemaps.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Visualsitemaps.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 221.1 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Visualsitemaps.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 989.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 215.9 kB

  • Original 249.2 kB
  • After minification 249.1 kB
  • After compression 33.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 215.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 989.2 kB
  • After minification 984.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Visual Sitemaps images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 29 B

  • Original 298.6 kB
  • After minification 298.6 kB
  • After compression 298.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (38%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

56

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visual Sitemaps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

visualsitemaps.com

visualsitemaps.com

46 ms

visualsitemaps.com

visualsitemaps.com

2795 ms

css

css

80 ms

style.css

style.css

37 ms

init.min.js

init.min.js

23 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

34 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

34 ms

1s5utcln9w.jsonp

1s5utcln9w.jsonp

298 ms

E-v1.js

E-v1.js

303 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

279 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

29 ms

global.min.js

global.min.js

69 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

71 ms

menuSystem.min.js

menuSystem.min.js

279 ms

disableHoverScroll.min.js

disableHoverScroll.min.js

71 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

70 ms

tapHover.min.js

tapHover.min.js

294 ms

preventDoubleTransition.min.js

preventDoubleTransition.min.js

293 ms

printScreen.min.js

printScreen.min.js

292 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

293 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

291 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

294 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

296 ms

owl.carousel2.min.js

owl.carousel2.min.js

297 ms

inview.min.js

inview.min.js

296 ms

carousel.min.js

carousel.min.js

297 ms

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

297 ms

stickyElements.min.js

stickyElements.min.js

298 ms

onePage.min.js

onePage.min.js

298 ms

collapse.min.js

collapse.min.js

298 ms

collapse.min.js

collapse.min.js

299 ms

checkScrollForTabs.min.js

checkScrollForTabs.min.js

299 ms

transition.min.js

transition.min.js

300 ms

app-loader.min.js

app-loader.min.js

300 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

315 ms

vsm-logo-small.svg

vsm-logo-small.svg

117 ms

dot-brightgreen-opacity-70.png

dot-brightgreen-opacity-70.png

120 ms

UXtools-visualsitemaps.png

UXtools-visualsitemaps.png

121 ms

flow-ecommerce-websiteDemo.png

flow-ecommerce-websiteDemo.png

123 ms

NYTimes.png

NYTimes.png

120 ms

flow-lofi-wifi-websiteDemo.jpg

flow-lofi-wifi-websiteDemo.jpg

121 ms

Volvo.png

Volvo.png

122 ms

flow-emailCampaign-websiteDemo.jpg

flow-emailCampaign-websiteDemo.jpg

124 ms

Caterpillar.png

Caterpillar.png

125 ms

flow-funnel-websiteDemo.jpg

flow-funnel-websiteDemo.jpg

123 ms

calendly-thumb-1.jpg

calendly-thumb-1.jpg

125 ms

sitemap-nike-cover.jpg

sitemap-nike-cover.jpg

126 ms

customer-frog.png

customer-frog.png

183 ms

customer-twilio.png

customer-twilio.png

184 ms

customer-RGA_8.png

customer-RGA_8.png

126 ms

customer-unsplash.png

customer-unsplash.png

361 ms

customer-docker-2.png

customer-docker-2.png

127 ms

customer-sapient.png

customer-sapient.png

116 ms

connectors.svg

connectors.svg

112 ms

feature-live-crawler.svg

feature-live-crawler.svg

113 ms

feature-coming-annotations.svg

feature-coming-annotations.svg

116 ms

feature-coming-forking.svg

feature-coming-forking.svg

121 ms

feature-Comparisons.svg

feature-Comparisons.svg

121 ms

feature-coming-passwordcrawls.svg

feature-coming-passwordcrawls.svg

121 ms

feature-Content-Planning-2.svg

feature-Content-Planning-2.svg

122 ms

feature-tag.svg

feature-tag.svg

129 ms

features-export-figma-5.svg

features-export-figma-5.svg

130 ms

feature-performance.svg

feature-performance.svg

132 ms

testimonial-dots.svg

testimonial-dots.svg

132 ms

neil-katz.jpg

neil-katz.jpg

132 ms

bk.jpg

bk.jpg

133 ms

0-e1555537862329.jpg

0-e1555537862329.jpg

133 ms

vs-manual-final.jpg

vs-manual-final.jpg

133 ms

vs-vsm-final.jpg

vs-vsm-final.jpg

154 ms

forDesigners-1.jpg

forDesigners-1.jpg

153 ms

forUXDesigners.jpg

forUXDesigners.jpg

152 ms

forDirectors.jpg

forDirectors.jpg

63 ms

forDevelopers.jpg

forDevelopers.jpg

63 ms

forSEOs.jpg

forSEOs.jpg

62 ms

forPMs.jpg

forPMs.jpg

63 ms

trust-6.png

trust-6.png

173 ms

trust-5.png

trust-5.png

141 ms

trust-3-1.png

trust-3-1.png

173 ms

trust-4.png

trust-4.png

1837 ms

trust-2.png

trust-2.png

172 ms

trust-1.png

trust-1.png

933 ms

Artur-Maklyarevsky.jpg

Artur-Maklyarevsky.jpg

931 ms

0.jpg

0.jpg

1833 ms

logo-footer.svg

logo-footer.svg

192 ms

popover.js

popover.js

11 ms

flashPlayer.js

flashPlayer.js

33 ms

bkg-dots-green.png

bkg-dots-green.png

58 ms

wistiaLogo.js

wistiaLogo.js

14 ms

share-v2.js

share-v2.js

65 ms

banner-stickies-signup.jpg

banner-stickies-signup.jpg

43 ms

profitwell.js

profitwell.js

690 ms

featured.svg

featured.svg

1587 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

98 ms

Accessibility Review

visualsitemaps.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

visualsitemaps.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

visualsitemaps.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visualsitemaps.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Visualsitemaps.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

visualsitemaps.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Visual Sitemaps. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: