Tools & Wizards About Us
vizworld.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

vizworld.com

Vizworld.com

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

222 ms

vizworld.com screenshot

About Website

Visit vizworld.com now to see the best up-to-date Vizworld content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vizworld.com

News, information and inspiration for design thinkers and innovators. Be Brave and Iterate, in business and in your life!

Visit vizworld.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vizworld.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vizworld.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.183

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vizworld.com

1072 ms

_TGLe7g2M107ERxePjbaID8mu68.js

17 ms

stub.js

55 ms

iubenda_cs.js

53 ms

analytics.js

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Vizworld.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Vizworld.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 101.7 kB (18%)

Content Size

577.5 kB

After Optimization

475.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vizworld.com main page is 577.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 301.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 101.1 kB

  • Original 119.2 kB
  • After minification 116.1 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 301.2 kB
  • After minification 301.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vizworld images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 396 B

  • Original 107.7 kB
  • After minification 107.6 kB
  • After compression 107.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 181 B

  • Original 49.4 kB
  • After minification 49.4 kB
  • After compression 49.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vizworld.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (80%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vizworld. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vizworld.com

vizworld.com

1072 ms

_TGLe7g2M107ERxePjbaID8mu68.js

_TGLe7g2M107ERxePjbaID8mu68.js

17 ms

stub.js

stub.js

55 ms

iubenda_cs.js

iubenda_cs.js

53 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

54 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

31 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

88 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

106 ms

wp-hide-post-public.js

wp-hide-post-public.js

88 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

33 ms

onejs

onejs

20 ms

pinit.js

pinit.js

31 ms

USNkTDfCEeSWwCIAC0MJiQ.js

USNkTDfCEeSWwCIAC0MJiQ.js

85 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

109 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

259 ms

comment_count.js

comment_count.js

109 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

115 ms

gtm4wp-youtube.js

gtm4wp-youtube.js

144 ms

player.js

player.js

91 ms

gtm4wp-vimeo.js

gtm4wp-vimeo.js

128 ms

fitvids.js

fitvids.js

188 ms

jquery.infinitescroll.min.js

jquery.infinitescroll.min.js

177 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

153 ms

custom.js

custom.js

175 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

20 ms

collect

collect

68 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

26 ms

card.html

card.html

189 ms

q

q

10 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

css

css

55 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

74 ms

collect

collect

34 ms

js

js

73 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

84 ms

widget-e8267578a27caea57a8aab9e2f9ad0d8f04715c0d3541111d841d010861ae076.css

widget-e8267578a27caea57a8aab9e2f9ad0d8f04715c0d3541111d841d010861ae076.css

64 ms

en.js

en.js

34 ms

scroll-timeline-polyfill.js

scroll-timeline-polyfill.js

52 ms

js

js

25 ms

autoptimize_single_6d7eb7baaa2b2aa4f55470fbae16b2d9.css

autoptimize_single_6d7eb7baaa2b2aa4f55470fbae16b2d9.css

72 ms

d3b7e7c508199f9895a22ccb9b5e4383_original.jpg

d3b7e7c508199f9895a22ccb9b5e4383_original.jpg

262 ms

946670e6b2e1b22d5f18ffcc198da33d_original.png

946670e6b2e1b22d5f18ffcc198da33d_original.png

323 ms

js

js

62 ms

autoptimize_single_ba4a47c9af5fe4e21a50f9ab0f79add9.css

autoptimize_single_ba4a47c9af5fe4e21a50f9ab0f79add9.css

47 ms

main.js

main.js

107 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

89 ms

autoptimize_single_5df1b1548148bc9e1993342178b68846.css

autoptimize_single_5df1b1548148bc9e1993342178b68846.css

16 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

136 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

18 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

36 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

76 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

77 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic0CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic0CsE.ttf

77 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xGIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xGIzc.ttf

78 ms

addthis_wordpress_public.min.css

addthis_wordpress_public.min.css

75 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

57 ms

Accessibility Review

vizworld.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vizworld.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

vizworld.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vizworld.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vizworld.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vizworld.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vizworld. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: