Tools & Wizards About Us
vol-retarde.fr screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

vol-retarde.fr

Vol retardé ou annulé ? Indemnisation des passagers aériens

Page Load Speed

786 ms in total

First Response

18 ms

Resources Loaded

453 ms

Page Rendered

315 ms

vol-retarde.fr screenshot

About Website

Visit vol-retarde.fr now to see the best up-to-date Vol Retarde content for Belgium and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vol-retarde.fr

Votre vol a eu du retard, a été annulé ou a été surbooké ? Vous pouvez rapidement savoir si vous avez droit à une indemnisation.

Visit vol-retarde.fr

Key Findings

We analyzed Vol-retarde.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 768 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vol-retarde.fr performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,440 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vol-retarde.fr

18 ms

vol-retarde.fr

20 ms

www.vol-retarde.fr

38 ms

7cf767f1-2348-4531-a4cf-4e506d15a94a

378 ms

app-a24c2811.js

12 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Vol-retarde.fr, 10% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (1 request) were made to App.termly.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (378 ms) relates to the external source App.termly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 70.3 kB (53%)

Content Size

131.8 kB

After Optimization

61.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vol-retarde.fr main page is 131.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 83.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 62.4 kB

  • Original 83.3 kB
  • After minification 83.3 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 26.5 kB
  • After minification 18.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vol Retarde needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 7.3 kB
  • After minification 7.3 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 14.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (24%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vol Retarde. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vol-retarde.fr

vol-retarde.fr

18 ms

vol-retarde.fr

vol-retarde.fr

20 ms

www.vol-retarde.fr

www.vol-retarde.fr

38 ms

7cf767f1-2348-4531-a4cf-4e506d15a94a

7cf767f1-2348-4531-a4cf-4e506d15a94a

378 ms

app-a24c2811.js

app-a24c2811.js

12 ms

app-11ee922b.css

app-11ee922b.css

21 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

80 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

107 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

150 ms

GxB48NkG.webp

GxB48NkG.webp

17 ms

upset.webp

upset.webp

17 ms

lady-mobile.webp

lady-mobile.webp

20 ms

lady-desktop.webp

lady-desktop.webp

19 ms

pointing-mobile.webp

pointing-mobile.webp

20 ms

pointing-desktop.webp

pointing-desktop.webp

18 ms

Qj7YjtHh.png

Qj7YjtHh.png

21 ms

cDkDrUav.png

cDkDrUav.png

110 ms

tWG4meFm.png

tWG4meFm.png

109 ms

bJYsTJuE.png

bJYsTJuE.png

28 ms

9tcxTVFs.png

9tcxTVFs.png

23 ms

Accessibility Review

vol-retarde.fr accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vol-retarde.fr best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

vol-retarde.fr SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vol-retarde.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vol-retarde.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vol-retarde.fr

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vol Retarde. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: