Tools & Wizards About Us
voyager.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

voyager.net

CoreComm | Internet & Web Hosting Solutions

Page Load Speed

696 ms in total

First Response

96 ms

Resources Loaded

523 ms

Page Rendered

77 ms

voyager.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Voyager content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about voyager.net

CoreComm - Internet Service Provider offering Web Hosting and Internet Access starting at only $19.95/month.

Visit voyager.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Voyager.net page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 600 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

voyager.net performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

voyager.net

96 ms

www.core.com

158 ms

newcore.css

23 ms

script.js

40 ms

cc07front.png

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Voyager.net, 92% (22 requests) were made to Core.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Cdn-cookieyes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (158 ms) relates to the external source Core.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 45.0 kB (17%)

Content Size

260.9 kB

After Optimization

215.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Voyager.net main page is 260.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 213.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 13.3 kB
  • After minification 11.8 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 35.3 kB

  • Original 213.0 kB
  • After minification 177.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Voyager needs image optimization as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 34.1 kB
  • After minification 34.1 kB
  • After compression 34.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 126 B

  • Original 586 B
  • After minification 586 B
  • After compression 460 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Voyager.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 126 B or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (45%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Voyager. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

voyager.net

voyager.net

96 ms

www.core.com

www.core.com

158 ms

newcore.css

newcore.css

23 ms

script.js

script.js

40 ms

cc07front.png

cc07front.png

25 ms

button_glass_go_red.png

button_glass_go_red.png

34 ms

google-pwr.png

google-pwr.png

58 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

66 ms

cc07girl.jpg

cc07girl.jpg

114 ms

cc07header.png

cc07header.png

68 ms

cc07price-0523.png

cc07price-0523.png

69 ms

cc07button.png

cc07button.png

70 ms

bullet_tri_hollow_orange.png

bullet_tri_hollow_orange.png

77 ms

cc07bottom.png

cc07bottom.png

158 ms

block-smartguard-3.png

block-smartguard-3.png

95 ms

block-hosting-single-1295-1220.png

block-hosting-single-1295-1220.png

141 ms

block-247.png

block-247.png

98 ms

cc07background.png

cc07background.png

100 ms

home-up.gif

home-up.gif

24 ms

offers-up.gif

offers-up.gif

23 ms

about-up.gif

about-up.gif

25 ms

products-up.gif

products-up.gif

24 ms

support-up.gif

support-up.gif

24 ms

account-up.gif

account-up.gif

25 ms

Accessibility Review

voyager.net accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

voyager.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

voyager.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Voyager.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Voyager.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

voyager.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Voyager. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: