Tools & Wizards About Us
bibledigging.wordpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

24 ms

Resources Loaded

986 ms

Page Rendered

240 ms

bibledigging.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bibledigging.wordpress.com homepage info - get ready to check Bible DIGGING Wordpress best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bibledigging.wordpress.com

Visit bibledigging.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bibledigging.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 24 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bibledigging.wordpress.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,960 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.3 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bibledigging.wordpress.com

24 ms

bibledigging.wordpress.com

306 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

135 ms

153 ms

138 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Bibledigging.wordpress.com, 31% (12 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 15% (6 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (307 ms) relates to the external source Secure.gravatar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.9 kB (34%)

Content Size

214.9 kB

After Optimization

141.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bibledigging.wordpress.com main page is 214.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 83.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 61.8 kB

  • Original 83.8 kB
  • After minification 81.2 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 67.2 kB
  • After minification 63.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bible DIGGING Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 56.7 kB
  • After minification 56.7 kB
  • After compression 48.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 75 B

  • Original 7.2 kB
  • After minification 7.2 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bibledigging.wordpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (63%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bible DIGGING Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bibledigging.wordpress.com

bibledigging.wordpress.com

24 ms

bibledigging.wordpress.com

bibledigging.wordpress.com

306 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

135 ms

153 ms

138 ms

164 ms

140 ms

style.css

style.css

150 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

162 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

223 ms

161 ms

148 ms

w.js

w.js

216 ms

global-print.css

global-print.css

82 ms

conf

conf

278 ms

ga.js

ga.js

130 ms

659dc74ef776a8a86048e265c3c4f271

659dc74ef776a8a86048e265c3c4f271

106 ms

daf704bee82eb9d74715b08b07258ff8

daf704bee82eb9d74715b08b07258ff8

271 ms

e9acf749463e246e38db4139e0ed9f91

e9acf749463e246e38db4139e0ed9f91

264 ms

1d355d5cc28ffd114f1237ad67cb7f91

1d355d5cc28ffd114f1237ad67cb7f91

307 ms

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

253 ms

main-bg.jpg

main-bg.jpg

100 ms

ico-rss.png

ico-rss.png

99 ms

main-top.jpg

main-top.jpg

99 ms

main-bot.jpg

main-bot.jpg

179 ms

post-bg.gif

post-bg.gif

178 ms

nNLGlOfl1OzZ1Yksrf7NTe3mN+KAIu1M6sZ2Ten4tSOXV2YmrnejTFF63+6YO55nCh1tdxy0X5xieS3dIKs955QVFcUfQjyYFwAA

nNLGlOfl1OzZ1Yksrf7NTe3mN+KAIu1M6sZ2Ten4tSOXV2YmrnejTFF63+6YO55nCh1tdxy0X5xieS3dIKs955QVFcUfQjyYFwAA

5 ms

social-logos.eot

social-logos.eot

102 ms

widgettitle.jpg

widgettitle.jpg

120 ms

sidebar-list-arr.gif

sidebar-list-arr.gif

183 ms

ico-rss-2.png

ico-rss-2.png

166 ms

g.gif

g.gif

187 ms

hovercard.min.css

hovercard.min.css

101 ms

services.min.css

services.min.css

137 ms

176 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

90 ms

g.gif

g.gif

138 ms

g.gif

g.gif

139 ms

ata.js

ata.js

75 ms

Accessibility Review

bibledigging.wordpress.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

bibledigging.wordpress.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bibledigging.wordpress.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bibledigging.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bibledigging.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bibledigging.wordpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bible DIGGING Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: