Tools & Wizards About Us
bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com

Scrawls From A CS Student « Why do Java developers wear glasses? Because they can't C#! (….I'll just close the door on my way out).

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

9 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

4 sec

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bridgetdeskus Wordpress content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com

Why do Java developers wear glasses? Because they can't C#! (....I'll just close the door on my way out).

Visit bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.9 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com

9 ms

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com

33 ms

125 ms

style.css

126 ms

136 ms

Our browser made a total of 144 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (109 requests) were addressed to the original Bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com, 6% (8 requests) were made to S0.wp.com and 6% (8 requests) were made to S2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (896 ms) belongs to the original domain Bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 265.4 kB (11%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 264.7 kB

  • Original 318.4 kB
  • After minification 314.3 kB
  • After compression 53.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 264.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bridgetdeskus Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 377 B

  • Original 114.7 kB
  • After minification 114.7 kB
  • After compression 114.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 323 B

  • Original 25.0 kB
  • After minification 25.0 kB
  • After compression 24.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (18%)

Requests Now

139

After Optimization

114

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 139 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bridgetdeskus Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com

9 ms

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com

33 ms

125 ms

style.css

style.css

126 ms

136 ms

137 ms

125 ms

style.css

style.css

143 ms

css

css

158 ms

142 ms

global.css

global.css

132 ms

146 ms

hovercards.min.js

hovercards.min.js

140 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

138 ms

138 ms

140 ms

w.js

w.js

139 ms

global-print.css

global-print.css

6 ms

conf

conf

275 ms

ga.js

ga.js

178 ms

stripe.png

stripe.png

75 ms

photo.jpg

photo.jpg

368 ms

wpcom-gray-white.png

wpcom-gray-white.png

129 ms

wpcom-mark.svg

wpcom-mark.svg

116 ms

g.gif

g.gif

184 ms

183 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

112 ms

search.png

search.png

113 ms

ornament.png

ornament.png

155 ms

116-e13865681291741.png

116-e13865681291741.png

210 ms

210.png

210.png

237 ms

36.png

36.png

294 ms

45.png

45.png

277 ms

55.png

55.png

258 ms

56.png

56.png

314 ms

65.png

65.png

346 ms

74.png

74.png

375 ms

83.png

83.png

396 ms

94.png

94.png

409 ms

105.png

105.png

455 ms

117.png

117.png

470 ms

124.png

124.png

479 ms

134.png

134.png

482 ms

143.png

143.png

540 ms

photo-11.jpg

photo-11.jpg

580 ms

photo-21.jpg

photo-21.jpg

669 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

559 ms

21.jpg

21.jpg

550 ms

31.jpg

31.jpg

560 ms

41.jpg

41.jpg

624 ms

51.jpg

51.jpg

656 ms

114.png

114.png

650 ms

29.png

29.png

663 ms

35.png

35.png

704 ms

44.png

44.png

758 ms

54.png

54.png

768 ms

64.png

64.png

773 ms

73.png

73.png

761 ms

82.png

82.png

790 ms

92.png

92.png

817 ms

104.png

104.png

855 ms

115.png

115.png

858 ms

123.png

123.png

896 ms

133.png

133.png

880 ms

g.gif

g.gif

173 ms

g.gif

g.gif

167 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

79 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

84 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

82 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

41 ms

ata.js

ata.js

12 ms

142.png

142.png

702 ms

photo-1.jpg

photo-1.jpg

793 ms

photo-2.jpg

photo-2.jpg

840 ms

110.png

110.png

694 ms

27.png

27.png

745 ms

33.png

33.png

718 ms

43.png

43.png

692 ms

53.png

53.png

742 ms

63.png

63.png

747 ms

72.png

72.png

741 ms

81.png

81.png

752 ms

91.png

91.png

726 ms

103.png

103.png

724 ms

113.png

113.png

756 ms

122.png

122.png

774 ms

132.png

132.png

713 ms

141.png

141.png

739 ms

161.png

161.png

715 ms

171.png

171.png

752 ms

181.png

181.png

769 ms

13.png

13.png

730 ms

23.png

23.png

721 ms

32.png

32.png

744 ms

42.png

42.png

753 ms

52.png

52.png

768 ms

62.png

62.png

785 ms

71.png

71.png

728 ms

8.png

8.png

768 ms

9.png

9.png

760 ms

102.png

102.png

762 ms

112.png

112.png

764 ms

121.png

121.png

790 ms

131.png

131.png

771 ms

14.png

14.png

852 ms

15.png

15.png

785 ms

16.png

16.png

776 ms

17.png

17.png

780 ms

18.png

18.png

745 ms

25.png

25.png

738 ms

26.png

26.png

773 ms

28.png

28.png

745 ms

221.png

221.png

758 ms

231.png

231.png

738 ms

24.png

24.png

739 ms

12.png

12.png

758 ms

22.png

22.png

765 ms

31.png

31.png

802 ms

51.png

51.png

731 ms

41.png

41.png

746 ms

61.png

61.png

731 ms

1.png

1.png

730 ms

11.png

11.png

767 ms

3.png

3.png

757 ms

new1.png

new1.png

764 ms

new2.png

new2.png

780 ms

7.png

7.png

722 ms

photo.jpg

photo.jpg

700 ms

101.png

101.png

771 ms

111.png

111.png

792 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

750 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

685 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

672 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

723 ms

6-e1386132431742.jpg

6-e1386132431742.jpg

670 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

687 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

725 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

711 ms

13.jpg

13.jpg

685 ms

12.jpg

12.jpg

641 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

653 ms

14.jpg

14.jpg

647 ms

actionbar.css

actionbar.css

2 ms

actionbar.js

actionbar.js

9 ms

Accessibility Review

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bridgetdeskus.wordpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bridgetdeskus Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: