Tools & Wizards About Us
wapspider.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

wapspider.com

WapSpider.Com - Build Career with Informations and Technologies

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

497 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

780 ms

wapspider.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wap Spider content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wapspider.com

Build Career with Informations and Technologies

Visit wapspider.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wapspider.com page load time and found that the first response time was 497 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wapspider.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value17.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value32.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.32

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wapspider.com

497 ms

www.wapspider.com

901 ms

js

89 ms

style.min.css

19 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Wapspider.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Wapspider.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 467.0 kB (11%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wapspider.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 100.3 kB

  • Original 114.3 kB
  • After minification 87.2 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.1 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.3 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 346.0 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wap Spider images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

  • Original 93.7 kB
  • After minification 93.7 kB
  • After compression 80.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 93.5 kB
  • After minification 93.5 kB
  • After compression 86.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wapspider.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (65%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wap Spider. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wapspider.com

wapspider.com

497 ms

www.wapspider.com

www.wapspider.com

901 ms

js

js

89 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

19 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

28 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

26 ms

css

css

49 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

42 ms

style.css

style.css

38 ms

default.css

default.css

50 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

50 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

34 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

41 ms

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.css

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.css

55 ms

customizer.css

customizer.css

55 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

60 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

61 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

71 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

70 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

74 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

80 ms

jquery.smartmenus.js

jquery.smartmenus.js

79 ms

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.js

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.js

82 ms

jquery.marquee.js

jquery.marquee.js

99 ms

main.js

main.js

99 ms

e-202440.js

e-202440.js

24 ms

custom.js

custom.js

82 ms

custom-time.js

custom-time.js

185 ms

head-back.jpg

head-back.jpg

18 ms

Answers-to-the-Most-Common-Interview-Questions-With-Examples-150x150.png

Answers-to-the-Most-Common-Interview-Questions-With-Examples-150x150.png

19 ms

image-1-150x150.png

image-1-150x150.png

20 ms

openart-image_o_XGnrc3_1716535684396_raw-150x150.jpg

openart-image_o_XGnrc3_1716535684396_raw-150x150.jpg

20 ms

Untitled-design-2-150x150.png

Untitled-design-2-150x150.png

17 ms

Answers-to-the-Most-Common-Interview-Questions-With-Examples.png

Answers-to-the-Most-Common-Interview-Questions-With-Examples.png

16 ms

28-05-2024-03-32-43-PM.png

28-05-2024-03-32-43-PM.png

30 ms

Untitled-design-1.png

Untitled-design-1.png

40 ms

openart-image_o_XGnrc3_1716535684396_raw.jpg

openart-image_o_XGnrc3_1716535684396_raw.jpg

50 ms

Untitled-design.png

Untitled-design.png

51 ms

Untitled-design-2.png

Untitled-design-2.png

49 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

22 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

29 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

39 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

38 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

1187 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

813 ms

Accessibility Review

wapspider.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wapspider.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

wapspider.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wapspider.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wapspider.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wapspider.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wap Spider. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: